学生对同伴互评的看法
Students' Perceptions of Peer Grading
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
研究学生对同伴互评的看法，通过混合来源主题分析及微调模型筛选数据，综合多方面证据，发现学生对同伴互评利弊兼具，且人工智能使用或削弱信任，还确定了缓解策略。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
同伴互评在教育中被广泛使用，但引发了教育工作者和学生的不同反应。许多研究虽考察了学生对同伴互评的看法，但结果分散。为此，我们对文献及Reddit上的学生讨论进行混合来源主题分析。通过微调Gemini 2.5文本分类模型筛选数据，综合107篇论文、114个Reddit帖子和300条评论的证据。结果表明学生认为同伴互评有利有弊，还发现Reddit讨论中提到的人工智能在同伴互评中的使用可能削弱学生信任，此外还确定了八种缓解策略。
英文摘要
Peer grading is widely used in education, yet it elicits mixed reactions from educators and students. Although many studies have examined students' views of peer grading, their findings are scattered, and no clear overall picture has emerged. To address this gap, we conducted a mixed-source thematic analysis of literature and student discussions on Reddit. To scale our analysis of the Reddit data, we fine-tuned a Gemini 2.5 text-classification model to classify an initial dataset of 659 posts and 6,607 comments by relevance. Manual review of the items classified as relevant by the model yielded a final dataset of 114 posts and 300 comments. Drawing on evidence from 107 papers and the Reddit dataset, we found that students perceive peer grading as both beneficial and problematic. Positive perceptions included learning and understanding benefits, skill development, engagement, and collaboration, while negative perceptions centered on unreliable grading, unfairness, weak feedback quality, emotional stress, and workload. Reddit discussions also suggested an emerging concern that remains underexplored in the literature: AI use in peer grading may weaken students' trust in the accuracy and authenticity of the process. We further identified eight mitigation strategies and mapped them to the negative perceptions they help address. Among these, instructor oversight and training played the most central role.
发表机构
- North Carolina State University（北卡罗来纳州立大学）
- College of Charleston（查尔斯顿学院）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。
