arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2607.15351quant-phgr-qc

第三个粒子的悖论是经典的

The Paradox of the Third Particle is classical

Ladina Hausmann, Renato Renner

AI总结:

研究第三个粒子的悖论,发现其在经典情况下就已出现,建立不可行定理,表明当物理子系统作参考系且要求框架变换信息保持时,无法有意义地将世界划分为子系统。

AI中文摘要:

当粒子相对于其中一个作为参考系来描述时,就会出现第三个粒子的悖论。虽然它通常被归因于量子叠加,但我们表明,该悖论及其后果,如子系统的相对性,在经典情况下就已经出现。鉴于这一见解,我们建立了一个不可行定理,无论物理子系统是经典的还是量子的,只要用作参考系:如果要求框架变换是信息保持的,那么从每个框架的角度来看,就不可能有意义地将世界划分为子系统,如单个粒子。

英文摘要:

The Paradox of the Third Particle arises when particles are described relative to one of them serving as a reference frame. Although it is typically attributed to quantum superpositions, we show that the paradox and its ramifications$\unicode{x2014}$such as the relativity of subsystems$\unicode{x2014}$already occur classically. In light of this insight, we establish a no-go theorem that holds whenever physical subsystems, whether classical or quantum, are used as reference frames: if one demands that frame transformations be information-preserving, then it is impossible to meaningfully partition the world into subsystems, like individual particles, from the perspective of each frame.

补充信息

↑