发表机构
Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg; Department of Political Science, Stockholm University（哥德堡大学政治系; 斯德哥尔摩大学政治系）
机构由 AI 辅助整理，请以论文原文为准。AI 中文总结
研究人工智能监管问题，通过在七个国家进行联合调查实验，发现公民强烈支持监管AI，普遍优先考虑安全、公共治理和国际方法，揭示了主流监管方法与公民偏好的系统性错位。
AI 中文摘要
人工智能正在迅速改变经济、社会和政治，引发了关于如何对其进行监管的基本问题。政策制定者面临着在优先考虑创新还是安全、依靠公众监督还是私人自我监管以及在国家层面还是国际层面进行治理等方面的选择。然而，对于公民如何评估这些相互竞争的优先事项却知之甚少。在此，我们报告了一项在七个具有不同政治和经济概况的国家进行的联合调查实验。我们发现，公民强烈支持对人工智能进行监管，总体上优先考虑安全而非创新、公共治理而非私人自我监管、国际方法而非国家方法。对安全的偏好在那些认为人工智能有风险、不可预测且与个人相关的人中最为强烈。这些发现揭示了主流监管方法与公民偏好之间的系统性错位。
英文摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming economies, societies, and polities, raising fundamental questions about how it should be regulated. Policymakers face choices over whether to prioritize innovation or safety, rely on public oversight or private self-regulation, and govern nationally or internationally. Yet little is known about how citizens evaluate these competing priorities. Here we report a conjoint survey experiment conducted in seven countries with diverse political and economic profiles. We find that citizens strongly support regulating AI and generally prioritize safety over innovation, public governance over private self-regulation, and international over national approaches. The preference for safety is strongest among those who perceive AI as risky, unpredictable, and personally consequential. These findings reveal a systematic misalignment between dominant regulatory approaches and citizen preferences.
CommentsMain paper 16 pages; supplementary materials 51 pages
