arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~

动态行锤阈值管理:用于内存中防御的温度感知阈值退化

Dynamic Rowhammer Threshold Management: Temperature-Aware Threshold for In-DRAM Defenses

Aziz Alajmi, Hoeseok Yang

arXiv 2607.10392首次发表:更新:

AI 中文总结

研究针对内存中行锤防御阈值随温度变化的问题,提出动态行锤阈值管理方法,通过线性-T模型和保护带调整各防御阈值,经实验验证能降低PRAC和SALT-C的突破次数,对TRR起诊断作用,且延迟较低。

AI 中文摘要

内存中行锤防御在制造时固定缓解阈值,但真正的行锤阈值(TRHD)会随运行时温度变化。我们提出了动态行锤阈值管理,这是一个与防御无关的运行时层,它通过带有VRD激励保护带g的线性-T模型,每轮从观测温度重新调整各防御的阈值,通过各防御的阈值参数将结果投影到SALT-C、PRAC和TRR上。一个解耦预言机按δ~N(1,σ)缩放每个DIMM的物理TRHD会破坏模型自一致性。该层将PRAC在85°C时的72次陈旧性突破降至零;在σ =0.10时,扫描g将PRAC突破从38.4(g =1.0)降至9.6(g =0.9)。SALT-C从10次名义静态突破降至2次(动态)再到0次(自举),延迟≤5.1%。TRR受容量限制,该层起诊断作用。

英文摘要

In-DRAM Rowhammer defenses pin the mitigation threshold at manufacture time, yet the true Rowhammer Threshold (TRHD) varies with runtime temperature. We propose Dynamic Rowhammer Threshold Management, a defense-agnostic runtime layer that re-sources each defense's threshold from the observed temperature once per epoch via a linear-$T$ model with a VRD-motivated guardband $g$, projecting the result onto SALT-C, PRAC, and TRR through each defense's threshold parameter. A decoupled oracle that scales physical TRHD per-DIMM by $δ\sim \mathrm{N}(1, σ)$ breaks model self-consistency. The layer drives PRAC's 72 staleness breaches at 85$^\circ$C to zero; at $σ{=}0.10$, sweeping $g$ collapses PRAC breaches from 38.4 ($g{=}1.0$) to 9.6 ($g{=}0.9$). SALT-C drops from 10 nominal-static breaches to 2 (Dynamic) to 0 (bootstrap), at $\leq$5.1\% latency. TRR is capacity-limited; the layer acts as a diagnostic.

CommentsPresented at the Sixth Workshop on DRAM Security (DRAMSec 2026), June 2026

论文原文

arXiv 摘要页 · PDF 原文 · HTML 原文

↑