arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2607.08511cs.LGcs.CV
收藏

跨异构架构的学习率调度策略的系统评估

Systematic Evaluation of Learning Rate Scheduling Strategies Across Heterogeneous Architectures

Computer Vision Lab, CAIDAS & IFI, University of Würzburg(维尔茨堡大学计算机视觉实验室、CAIDAS与IFI)

Hafsa Mateen, Radu Timofte, Dmitry Ignatov

AI总结:

研究跨异构架构的学习率调度策略,通过在LEMUR数据集评估30种架构,应用25种调度器配置于九个PyTorch家族,在CIFAR-10上评估3938个模型变体,发现调度器选择依赖架构,最佳配置准确率高,为调度器选择提供参考。

摘要:

选择学习率调度策略对神经网络训练至关重要,但手动选择成本高且难以详尽。经典自动机器学习方法常将调度器视为次要超参数,本文系统研究其对多种架构分类准确率的影响。在LEMUR神经网络数据集中评估了30种卷积和Transformer家族的代表性架构,通过自动源代码注入应用25种调度器配置,在CIFAR-10上评估了3938个模型变体。最佳配置top-1准确率达86.45%,237个变体超过80%。结果表明调度器选择很大程度上依赖架构,相关准确率情况为调度器选择提供了实用参考。

英文摘要:

Choosing a learning rate scheduling strategy is critical to neural network training, but manual selection is costly and rarely exhaustive. While classical AutoML approaches often treat the scheduler as a secondary hyperparameter, we systematically investigate its impact on classification accuracy across a diverse pool of architectures. We evaluated 30 representative architectures from convolutional and transformer families within the LEMUR neural network dataset. Through automated source-code injection, we applied 25 scheduler configurations across nine PyTorch families, evaluating a total of 3,938 model variants on CIFAR-10. Our best configuration achieved a top-1 accuracy of 86.45%, with 237 variants exceeding 80%. The results show that the choice of scheduler depends heavily on the architecture: CosineAnnealingWarmRestarts and CyclicLR consistently outperform basic decay strategies. The resulting accuracy landscape, contributed to the LEMUR nn-dataset, provides a practical reference for principled scheduler selection.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑