arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2607.08029cs.LG

重新思考小型视觉语言模型量化:从组件级分析到硬件感知边缘部署

Rethinking Small VLM Quantization: From Component-Wise Analysis to Hardware-Aware Edge Deployment

Hyeju Shin, Chorwon Kim, Ryangsoo Kim, Hark Yoo, Jaein Kim

AI总结:

本文针对小型视觉语言模型量化,提出系统评估框架,在特定硬件上验证五个假设,分离相关组件得出结论,包括量化敏感性受结构范式影响、SigLIP编码器延迟情况、大语言模型INT4量化利弊、复合量化误差特点及不同平台每焦耳智能差异。

摘要:

参数少于30亿的视觉语言模型的出现加速了设备上多模态智能的实现。然而,对组件级量化的详细理解仍然是优化部署的瓶颈。本文提出了一个系统评估框架,在Jetson Orin NX和AGX上针对六种量化配置实证验证五个假设。通过分离视觉编码器、投影仪和大语言模型主干得出以下结果:(1)量化敏感性由结构范式(混合专家模型与密集模型)而非规模单独决定;(2)SigLIP编码器在Jetson Ampere上有不成比例的INT8延迟;(3)大语言模型的INT4量化虽大幅降低VRAM消耗,但因反量化开销导致令牌生成变慢;(4)复合量化误差大多是可加的;(5)由于内存带宽限制,每焦耳智能在不同平台上差异显著。

英文摘要:

The emergence of vision language models with fewer than 3 billion parameters has accelerated the implementation of on-device multimodal intelligence. However, a detailed understanding of component-wise quantization remains a bottleneck for optimal deployment. This paper presents a systematic evaluation framework for empirically validating five hypotheses across six quantization configurations on the Jetson Orin NX and AGX. By separating the vision encoder, projector, and large language model backbone yields the following results: (1) Quantization sensitivity is governed by the structural paradigm (MoE vs. dense) rather than scale alone, with MoE backbones mitigating INT4 noise where dense backbones degrade; (2) SigLIP encoders incur disproportionate INT8 latency on Jetson Ampere--a deployment-specific encoder-kernel-hardware interaction, not a SigLIP flaw; (3) Although INT4 quantization of LLMs greatly reduces VRAM consumption, it also causes slower token generation due to dequantization overhead; (4) Composite quantization errors are largely additive, except along the modality-alignment path, which is architecture-dependent; (5) The intelligence-per-joule profile varies significantly across platforms owing to memory bandwidth constraints.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑