arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2607.07216cs.CV

为何造假?揭示深度伪造检测器的语义词汇

Why Fake ? Unveiling the Semantic Vocabulary of Deepfake Detectors

Information Technologies Institute (ITI) Centre For Research and Technology HELLAS (CERTH)(信息技术研究所(ITI)希腊研究与技术中心(CERTH))

Vazgken Vanian, Alexandros Doumanoglou, Dimitris Zarpalas

AI总结:

研究深度伪造检测,用编码-解码方向对技术分析黑箱检测器决策过程,揭示训练中隐含的真假特征,实现全局模型理解、空间感知概念定位和反事实分析,助于深入理解检测策略。

摘要:

深度伪造(DF)技术对信息完整性构成重大威胁,促使人们需要强大的检测方法。大多数DF检测器仅考虑预测输入是真实还是伪造的二元标签,缺乏法律程序等实际应用所需的正当理由。可解释的DF检测应运而生,但现有技术往往存在不足。这项工作研究了使用事后可解释人工智能(XAI)来分析先进的黑箱DF检测器的决策过程。具体而言,采用编码-解码方向对(EDDP)技术,揭示DF检测器的概念空间及其读写概念信息的机制。分析揭示了检测器训练期间隐含学习的隐藏的真实和伪造特征,有助于深入理解DF检测策略。

英文摘要:

Deepfake (DF) technology poses a significant threat to information integrity, driving the need for robust detection methods. Most DF detectors only consider predicting a binary label for whether the input is real or fake, lacking the justification required for real-world applications like legal proceedings. Explainable DF Detection has emerged to address this limitation, but existing techniques frequently fall short by either relying on human annotations for precise artifact localization or generating superficially plausible textual explanations without grounding. This work investigates the use of post-hoc explainable AI (XAI) to analyze the decision-making process of state-of-the-art black-box DF detectors. Specifically, we employ Encoding-Decoding Direction Pairs (EDDP), a technique suitable for uncovering the concept space of DF detectors (their semantic vocabulary) as well as the mechanism for writing and reading concept information to and from internal representations. Our analysis reveals previously hidden real and fake features learned implicitly during detector training, offering nuanced explanations unattainable through conventional methods. This enables global model understanding, spatially aware concept localization, and counterfactual what-if analysis, all contributing to a deeper comprehension of DF detection strategies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑