arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2607.05008cs.CVcs.AI

基于多域部分标记数据学习时用于稳健深度学习超声心动图分割的损失函数比较

Comparison of Loss Functions for Robust Deep Learning-based Echocardiography Segmentation when Learning with Partially Labelled Data from Multiple Domains

School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, UK(英国伦敦国王学院生物医学工程与影像科学学院)

Iman Islam, Esther Puyol-Antón, Bram Ruijsink, Andrew J. Reader, Andrew P. King

AI总结:

研究在超声心动图分割中使用部分标记数据训练模型的挑战,评估三种损失函数在处理此类数据时的性能,通过多场景和网络架构比较,揭示各损失函数优势,强调选合适损失函数优化模型性能。

摘要:

超声心动图是评估心脏功能的首要成像方式,准确分割心脏结构对获取生物标志物至关重要。然而,针对多种心脏结构开发有效的自动分割模型面临挑战,因为不同来源数据集往往部分标记。本研究旨在通过评估三种损失函数——自适应分类交叉熵(aCCE)损失、边际损失和自适应二元交叉熵(aBCE)损失——在处理部分标记数据方面的性能来应对这一挑战。我们在多种场景和网络架构下对这些损失函数进行了全面比较:域内和域间任务,包括单部分标记和多部分标记,以及全标记与部分标记数据的不同比例。我们的实验表明,所有三种损失函数在域内分割任务中都表现出强大性能,能有效处理同一域内的标签变化。对于域间任务,即在存在域转移的数据集上训练模型时,当某些训练示例缺少一个标签时,aBCE和边际损失表现出卓越性能。在涉及多个标签缺失的场景中,边际损失优于其他方法,证明了其在这种复杂条件下的稳健性。这些结果突出了每种损失函数在不同标记场景下的优势,强调了选择合适损失函数以优化模型性能的重要性。本研究是对超声心动图分割中处理来自多个不同域的部分标记数据的技术的首次调查,并提供了基于损失的解决方案的全面比较。

英文摘要:

Echocardiography is the first imaging modality used for assessing cardiac function, and accurate segmentation of cardiac structures is essential for deriving biomarkers. However, the development of effective automated segmentation models for multiple cardiac structures is challenged by the difficulty of training on datasets from different sources that are often partially-labelled. This study aims to address this challenge by evaluating the performance of three loss functions - adaptive categorical cross entropy (aCCE) loss, marginal loss, and the adaptive binary cross entropy (aBCE) loss - in handling partially-labelled data. We conduct a comprehensive comparison of these loss functions across multiple scenarios and network architectures: intra-domain and inter-domain tasks, with both single and multiple partial-labels, and varying proportions of fully-labelled to partially-labelled data. Our experiments reveal that all three loss functions exhibit strong performance in intra-domain segmentation tasks, effectively handling label variations within the same domain. For inter-domain tasks, where models are trained on datasets with a domain shift, the aBCE and marginal losses show superior performance when dealing with the case of one label being missing from some training examples. In scenarios involving more than one label being missing, marginal loss outperforms the other methods, demonstrating its robustness in such complex conditions. These results highlight the strengths of each loss function depending on the labelling scenario, emphasizing the importance of selecting the appropriate loss function to optimize model performance. This study represents the first investigation of techniques for handling partially-labelled data from multiple different domains in echocardiography segmentation and provides a comprehensive comparison of loss-based solutions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑