arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2607.03386cs.AIcs.LG
收藏

当聚合对齐产生误导时:无需逐状态专家操作的审核策略修复

When Aggregate Alignment Misleads: Auditing Policy Repair Without Per-State Expert Actions

Blossom AI(绽放人工智能公司);Blossom AI Labs(绽放人工智能实验室)

Peiying Zhu, Sidi Chang

AI总结:

研究在酒店定价模拟器中,智能策略编辑器仅接收区域级诊断反馈时的策略修复问题,用多重启大语言模型编辑器进行修复,其不仅提升收益还减小情节构成距离,结果表明应按诊断反馈是否成可靠闭环结果评估策略修复。

摘要:

智能AI系统越来越多地用于编辑、完善和修复决策策略,但在没有逐状态专家操作标签时评估这些编辑很困难。我们在酒店定价模拟器中研究此问题,智能策略编辑器仅接收区域级诊断反馈,在5000个保留情节上,多重启大语言模型编辑器接近基准策略,结果表明应按诊断反馈是否成为可靠闭环结果评估智能策略修复。

英文摘要:

Agentic AI systems are increasingly used to edit, refine, and repair decision policies, but evaluating these edits is difficult when per-state expert action labels are unavailable. We study this problem in a hotel-pricing simulator where an agentic policy editor receives only region-level diagnostic feedback: summaries of how its price distribution differs from a benchmark policy across time, inventory, and market regions. The editor cannot observe benchmark actions, benchmark source code, reward numbers, or held-out outcomes, and may only propose constrained edits to a target-action table. On 5,000 held-out episodes, a multi-restart LLM editor reaches RevPAR 108.47 (95% CI 107.61 - 109.34), close to the benchmark policy's 108.75 (107.81 - 109.68), with paired gap (LLM minus benchmark) -0.276 and 95% CI [-0.692, 0.146]. A cheap diagnostic projection already recovers much of the revenue (107.90), so the LLM editor's distinctive gain is not raw revenue lift alone: it also reduces episode composition distance from 1.153 to 0.609. This is the strongest non-benchmark repair result. This profile is not explained by restart search alone: non-semantic proposers with up to 2,500 evaluations fall 8.77 - 14.57 RevPAR points short. Nor is it explained by plausible prompt format: a shuffled-diagnostic control breaks region-error correspondence and falls to RevPAR 94.30. The match is genuine but partial. A tree editor achieves stronger pooled alignment, 0.214 versus 0.266, and stronger reference-state D1, 0.328 versus 1.197, yet revenue falls to 98.91. These results show that agentic policy repair should be evaluated by whether diagnostic feedback becomes reliable closed-loop outcome, not by a single behavioral distance.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑