arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2607.02451cs.CR
收藏

SoK: 网络安全事件响应影响因素的分类体系

SoK: A Taxonomy for Cybersecurity Incident Response Influence Factors

FH Münster University of Applied Sciences(明斯特应用科学大学);Fraunhofer SIT and National Research Center for Applied Cybersecurity ATHENE(弗劳恩霍夫SIT和应用网络安全国家研究中心ATHENE);Graduate School for Applied Research in North Rhine-Westphalia (Graduate School NRW)(北莱茵-威斯特法伦州应用研究研究生院);International Computer Science Institute, UC Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校国际计算机科学研究所)

Thomas Biege, Marius Brockhoff, Jonas Kaspereit, Fabian Ising, Lea Gröber, Sebastian Schinzel

AI总结:

通过系统文献综述,提出网络安全事件响应影响因素分类体系(CIR-IF Taxonomy),整合技术、人机交互、组织理论和人为因素,为事件响应研究提供结构化框架。

摘要:

网络安全事件响应已成为研究人员和从业者关注的关键领域。关于网络安全事件响应的文献正在扩展,但缺乏一个统一的框架来系统组织积累的知识。事件响应的方面涵盖多个领域,包括技术、人机交互、组织理论和人为因素。对这些因素的综合、整合视角可以使研究人员识别未充分探索的领域,并更有效地针对其经验和理论研究。我们的研究系统化了影响组织对网络安全事件准备和响应的因素。通过对学术文献(n = 417)和非科学出版物(n = 40)的系统综述,我们推导出了“网络安全事件响应影响因素分类体系”(CIR-IF Taxonomy)。现有的实证发现被分类到该分类体系中,提供了从1999年到2024年中期的全面且最新的知识概览。该分类体系的类别与七个已建立的科学框架以及《NIST特别出版物800-61r3》事件响应配置文件中引用的NIST网络安全框架元素进行了系统比较。比较结果表明,CIR-IF分类体系提供了更丰富、更严谨、更系统组织的关于驱动和塑造事件响应的因素的视图。

英文摘要:

Cybersecurity incident response has emerged as a critical area of interest for both researchers and practitioners. The corpus of literature on cybersecurity incident response is expanding, yet a unified framework for systematically organizing the accumulated knowledge remains absent. The aspects of incident response span multiple domains, including technology, human-computer interaction, organizational theory, and human factors. A comprehensive, integrative perspective on these factors can enable researchers to identify underexplored areas and more effectively target their empirical and theoretical investigations. Our study systematizes the factors that influence organizational preparedness for and response to cybersecurity incidents. Through a systematic review of academic literature (n = 417) and non-scientific publications (n = 40), we derived the "Cybersecurity Incident Response Influencing Factor Taxonomy" (\textit{CIR-IF Taxonomy}). Existing empirical findings were classified within this taxonomy, providing a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of knowledge from the period 1999 to mid-2024. The taxonomy categories were systematically compared with seven established scientific frameworks and with the \textit{NIST Cyber Security Framework} elements referenced in the \textit{NIST Special Publication 800-61r3} incident response profile. The results of this comparison show that the \textit{CIR-IF Taxonomy} delivers a richer, more rigorous, and more systematically organized view of the factors that drive and shape incident response.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑