arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2607.02300cs.CVcs.SE

基于搜索的车内场景理解视觉语言模型测试

Search-based Testing of Vision Language Models for In-Car Scene Understanding

BMW Group, Technical University of Munich(宝马集团、慕尼黑技术大学);Technical University of Munich(慕尼黑技术大学);Technical University of Munich, fortiss GmbH(慕尼黑技术大学、fortiss GmbH)

Lev Sorokin, Chen Yang, Ken E. Friedl, Andrea Stocco

AI总结:

提出ISU-Test方法,结合渲染场景生成与搜索测试,通过优化场景参数自动生成多样化车内场景,评估VLM在问答和字幕任务中的性能,相比随机生成故障率提高10倍,故障覆盖率提高3.6倍。

摘要:

在汽车领域,车内场景理解(ISU)能够检测安全关键事件(如驾驶员分心),并通过分析车内场景和调整环境(如环境照明)来支持驾驶员或乘客。工业界正越来越多地探索视觉语言模型(VLM)来解释摄像头记录的车内场景,并为下游推理任务提取信息。然而,VLM可能生成不完整、错误或误导性的场景描述,凸显了系统测试的必要性。收集真实车内数据成本高昂、难以扩展,且在早期设计阶段通常不可行。本文提出ISU-Test,一种自动化测试方法,结合基于渲染的场景生成与基于搜索的测试来评估ISU系统。通过将测试构建为优化问题并系统修改场景参数,我们的方法生成多样化的车内场景并探索广泛的配置。我们在工业原型和开源VLM上,通过两个案例研究(问答和字幕)评估ISU-Test,并与随机场景生成进行对比。结果表明,ISU-Test显著优于基线,故障率提高高达10倍,故障覆盖率提高高达3.6倍。

英文摘要:

In the automotive domain, in-car scene understanding (ISU) enables the detection of safety-critical events, such as driver distraction, and supports drivers or passengers by analyzing the in-car scene and adapting the environment (e.g., ambient lighting). The industry is increasingly exploring vision-language models (VLMs) to interpret camera-recorded in-car scenes and extract information for downstream reasoning tasks. However, VLMs may generate incomplete, erroneous, or misleading scene descriptions, highlighting the need for systematic testing. Collecting real in-vehicle data is costly, difficult to scale, and often infeasible, particularly in early design stages. In this paper, we present ISU-Test, an automated testing approach that combines rendering-based scene generation with search-based testing to evaluate ISU systems. By framing testing as an optimization problem and systematically modifying scene parameters, our method generates diverse in-car scenarios and explores a wide range of configurations. We evaluate ISU-Test on both an industrial prototype and open-source VLMs across two case studies: question answering and captioning, comparing against randomized scenario generation. Results show that ISU-Test significantly outperforms the baseline, achieving up to 10 times higher failure rates and up to 3.6 times higher failure coverage.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑