arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2606.18005cs.AIecon.GNq-fin.EC
收藏

LLM消费者行为理论:一个新兴研究领域的基础

LLM Consumer Behavior Theory: Foundations of a Novel Research Field

Department of Engineering Management, University of Antwerp(安特卫普大学工程管理系)

Manon Reusens, Sofie Goethals, David Martens

AI总结:

本文提出LLM消费者行为理论,研究LLM代理在市场中代表人类消费决策的行为,整合经济学与自然语言处理,探讨偏好表达、市场聚合及理性假设的失效。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLM)越来越多地被部署为自主代理,代表用户做出消费决策。这一转变对传统上以人类为主要决策者的消费者理论提出了基本问题。在本文中,我们引入了LLM消费者行为理论,这是一个关注分析代理市场中消费者行为的新研究领域。借鉴经典和行为经济学以及自然语言处理的最新进展,我们形式化了人类偏好如何被基于LLM的代理反映和执行,以及代理级别的决策如何聚合为市场需求。我们将先前关于LLM决策、人类行为模拟和偏好诱导的分散文献统一在共同的经济视角下,强调了理性、异质性等假设在代理市场中可能失效的地方。本文不提供实证验证,而是概述了LLM消费者行为的范围,并识别了与对齐、偏好表示和市场动态相关的开放研究问题。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as autonomous agents that make consumption decisions on behalf of users. This shift raises fundamental questions for consumer theory, which has traditionally modeled humans as the primary decision-makers. In this paper, we introduce LLM Consumer Behavior Theory, a new field of study concerned with analyzing consumer behavior in agentic markets. Drawing on classical and behavioral economics alongside recent advances in Natural Language Processing, we formalize how human preferences are reflected and acted upon by LLM-based agents, and how agent-level decisions aggregate into market demand. We unify previously fragmented literature on LLM decision-making, human behavior simulation, and preference elicitation under a common economic lens, highlighting where assumptions, such as rationality and heterogeneity, may fail in agentic markets. Rather than providing empirical validation, this paper outlines the scope of LLM consumer behavior and identifies open research questions related to alignment, preference representation, and market dynamics.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑