arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2606.03301cs.CLcs.CV
收藏

SagaQA:面向电视剧长篇叙事理解的多跳推理基准

SagaQA: A Multi-hop Reasoning Benchmark for Long-form Narrative Understanding in TV Series

IRIT, University of Toulouse, France(法国图卢兹大学IRIT中心);Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore(新加坡科技研究局);CNRS, IRIT, France(法国CNRS与IRIT)

Galann Pennec, Zhengyuan Liu, Nicholas Asher, Philippe Muller, Nancy F. Chen

AI总结:

提出SagaQA基准,通过跨剧集的多跳推理任务评估模型对完整电视剧多模态叙事的高层次理解,并比较并行、顺序和混合三种规划策略的性能。

摘要:

我们介绍了SagaQA,一个用于对完整电视剧进行多跳推理的长视频基准。现有的视频推理基准通常强调对相邻帧或片段的局部理解。SagaQA通过要求对整个电视剧中扩展的多模态叙事进行高层次理解来弥补这一空白。SagaQA的一个显著特征是其推理步骤的粒度。我们的数据集需要长距离推理跳跃来连接完全不同的剧集之间的信息。这要求模型对整个事件和动作进行推理,需要在多模态层面上深入理解剧集的叙事和进展。受近期智能体方法进展的启发,我们进一步研究了不同的规划策略如何处理这种复杂推理。我们将这些方法分为三类——并行规划器、顺序规划器和混合规划器——并评估它们生成连贯且完整推理计划的能力。我们在SagaQA上的结果表明,混合规划器始终能产生更高质量的计划,并在电视剧复杂、高层次叙事理解方面表现出更强的能力。

英文摘要:

We introduce SagaQA, a long-form video benchmark for multi-hop reasoning over full-length TV series. Existing video reasoning benchmarks often emphasize local understanding of adjacent frames or clips. SagaQA addresses this gap by requiring high-level comprehension of extended multimodal narratives in entire TV shows. A distinguishing feature of SagaQA is the granularity of its reasoning steps. Our dataset necessitates long-range reasoning hops to connect information across completely different episodes. This requires models to reason over entire events and actions, demanding a deep understanding of the show's narration and progression at a multimodal level. Motivated by recent progress in agentic methods, we further study how different planning strategies handle such complex reasoning. We categorize these approaches into three classes-Parallel, Sequential, and Hybrid planners-and evaluate their ability to generate coherent and complete reasoning plans. Our results on SagaQA suggest that hybrid planners consistently produce higher-quality plans and exhibit stronger capabilities for complex, high-level narrative understanding in TV shows.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑