arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2606.03284cs.CL

SEA-NLI:将自然语言推理作为理解东南亚文化的透镜

SEA-NLI: Natural Language Inference as a Lens into Southeast Asian Cultural Understanding

Chulalongkorn University(朱拉隆功大学);AI Singapore(新加坡人工智能机构);MBZUAI(穆罕默德·本·扎耶德人工智能大学);VISTEC(泰国国家科学技术发展局国家科学技术研究院)

Peerawat Chomphooyod, Jian Gang Ngui, Yosephine Susanto, Attapol T. Rutherford, Alham Fikri Aji, Sarana Nutanong, Can Udomcharoenchaikit, Peerat Limkonchotiwat

AI总结:

提出SEA-NLI基准,通过自然语言推理评估模型对东南亚文化的理解,发现现有模型表现不佳,文化适应和提示可提升性能。

摘要:

前沿LLM在西方语境中表现良好,但在东南亚等代表性不足的文化中测试不足。现有的NLI基准大多以西方为中心、源自翻译或单语,限制了其衡量文化基础推理的能力。我们引入了SEA-NLI,一个原生的、基于文化的NLI基准,涵盖八个东南亚国家的英语和本地区域语言,并由母语者验证。在17个编码器和解码器模型中,我们观察到所有模型表现较低,尤其是在语言和科技等知识密集型类别中。我们的分析表明,失败案例主要源于缺乏东南亚文化知识:适应东南亚的模型和文化感知提示提升了性能,而思维链提示带来的提升有限。

英文摘要:

Frontier LLMs perform well in Western contexts, but remain poorly tested on underrepresented cultures such as those in Southeast Asia (SEA). Existing NLI benchmarks are largely Western-centric, translation-derived, or monolingual, limiting their ability to measure culturally grounded reasoning. We introduce SEA-NLI, a native, culturally grounded NLI benchmark covering eight SEA countries in English and native regional languages, verified by native speakers. Across 17 encoder and decoder models, we observe a low performance from all models, especially for knowledge-intensive categories such as Languages and Science and Technology. Our analysis shows that failure cases mainly stem from missing SEA cultural knowledge: SEA-adapted models and culture-aware prompting improve performance, while CoT prompting offers limited gains.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑