arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2606.02860cs.LGcs.AI

遗忘并非擦除:通过传输键恢复潜在知识

Forgetting is Not Erasure: Recovering Latent Knowledge via Transport Keys

Axionic Labs(Axionic实验室)

Archie Chaudhury

AI总结:

通过缝合评估协议和紧凑的任务特定传输键,发现灾难性遗忘主要由内部阶段接口漂移而非任务相关计算的永久擦除引起,并能在顺序训练后恢复大部分早期任务性能。

摘要:

灾难性遗忘通常被视为表征问题:在顺序训练后,模型似乎失去了支持早期任务性能的特征。我们挑战了这一观点的更强形式。在受控的持续学习设置中,我们发现相当一部分明显的遗忘可归因于内部阶段之间的接口漂移,而非任务相关计算的永久擦除。我们通过一种缝合评估协议研究这一现象,该协议将更新后网络的早期计算与其前身的后期计算相结合,并可选地通过紧凑的任务特定传输键进行中介。我们在系统层面将传输键描述为紧凑的接口对齐算子,从少量配对的锚点激活中估计,并通过模型缝合进行评估。在split CIFAR-100上使用ResNet风格网络时,传输键在顺序训练任务B后恢复了大部分原始任务A的性能。在紧凑视觉变换器上,我们观察到类似的恢复模式。这些结果表明,持续学习可能需要更好的机制来索引和重新访问潜在计算,而不仅仅是防止权重变化的方法。

英文摘要:

Catastrophic forgetting is often framed as a representational problem: after sequential training, a model appears to lose the features that supported performance on earlier tasks. We challenge the stronger form of this view. Across controlled continual-learning settings, we find that a significant portion of apparent forgetting can be attributed to interface drift between internal stages rather than permanent erasure of task-relevant computation. We study this phenomenon through a stitched evaluation protocol that combines early computation from a post-update network with late computation from its predecessor, optionally mediated by a compact, task-specific transport key. We describe transport keys at a systems level as compact interface-alignment operators estimated from a small set of paired anchor activations and evaluated through model stitching. On split CIFAR-100 with a ResNet-style network, transport keys recover most of the original Task A performance after sequential training on Task B. On a compact vision transformer, we observe a similar recovery pattern. These results suggest that continual learning may require better mechanisms for indexing and re-accessing latent computations, not only methods that prevent weight change.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑