arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2606.02814cs.IRcs.AIcs.CL

神经检索器是否偏好某些文档?学习到的相关性先验的证据

Do Neural Retrievers Prefer Certain Documents? Evidence of Learned Relevance Priors

CONICET-Universidad de Buenos Aires(国家科学技术研究委员会-布宜诺斯艾利斯大学);Quantit(Quantit公司);Brno University of Technology(布尔诺理工大学)

Francisco Valentini, Edgar Altszyler, Martin Fajcik

AI总结:

通过分析监督双编码器检索器在文档嵌入中编码的查询无关信号,发现模型从标注数据中学习到文档级相关性先验,导致低先验文档即使相关也更难被检索,揭示了监督检索的结构性局限。

摘要:

神经检索器通过标注的查询-文档对训练来估计查询-文档相关性。然而,标注协议可能并不纯粹反映相关性:它们只选择一部分文档进行标注,并且这种选择可能偏向某些文档类型。我们研究监督双编码器检索器是否隐式学习了一个文档级相关性先验:一个查询无关的信号,作为在标注数据上训练的副作用编码在其表示空间中。我们通过在冻结的文档嵌入上训练简单分类器来估计这个先验,并在多个IR基准上评估三个最先进的检索器。我们发现监督神经检索器编码了能泛化到未见文档且跨模型一致的相关性先验。这些先验造成了可发现性差距:先验较低的文档即使真正相关也更难被检索。这种效应在监督密集检索器中出现,但在BM25中较弱且不一致,并在受控的匹配文档比较下持续存在。利用基于LLM的解释,我们发现被判定为相关的文档往往是主流主题的全面、自包含的摘要,而小众、零碎或高度技术性的内容通常未被评判。检索器内化了这种偏见,将具有这些偏好特征的文档排得比缺乏这些特征的文档更高,而与它们的实际相关性无关。我们的发现揭示了监督检索的结构性局限:在标注数据上训练的模型不仅学习相关性,还学习其训练数据中的隐式文档偏好。

英文摘要:

Neural retrievers are trained to estimate query-document relevance from annotated query-document pairs. Yet annotation protocols may not purely reflect relevance: they select only a subset of documents for labeling, and this selection can favor certain document types over others. We investigate whether supervised bi-encoder retrievers implicitly learn a document-level relevance prior: a query-independent signal encoded in their representation space as a side effect of training on annotated data. We estimate this prior by training simple classifiers on frozen document embeddings and evaluate three state-of-the-art retrievers across multiple IR benchmarks. We find that supervised neural retrievers encode relevance priors that generalize to unseen documents and are consistent across models. These priors create a findability gap: documents with lower prior are systematically harder to retrieve, even when genuinely relevant. This effect appears in supervised dense retrievers but is weaker and less consistent in BM25, and it persists under controlled matched-document comparisons. Using LLM-based explanations, we find that judged-relevant documents tend to be comprehensive, self-contained summaries of mainstream topics, while niche, fragmentary, or highly technical content is often left unjudged. Retrievers internalize this bias, ranking documents with these favored features higher than documents that lack them, independently of their actual relevance. Our findings expose a structural limitation of supervised retrieval: models trained on annotated data do not just learn relevance, but also the implicit document preferences in their training data.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑