arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2606.02499astro-ph.SR
收藏

通过IC1613和独立于Gaia的视差评估造父变星金属丰度效应测定

Evaluating Cepheid Metallicity Effect Determinations via IC1613 and Gaia-independent Parallaxes

Mount Saint Vincent University(蒙特圣文森特大学)

Daniel Majaess

AI总结:

利用18个HST视差统一建立独立于Gaia的IC1613距离,并基准测试三种造父变星金属丰度校正,发现较大校正不被支持,需更广泛金属丰度基线和更多非Gaia视差来检验较小校正。

摘要:

18个银河系经典造父变星的HST视差被统一,以建立独立于Gaia的IC1613距离并评估金属丰度效应测定,因为Gaia零点存在争议。最近提出的经典造父变星金属丰度校正$γ(W_{VI}) \simeq 0, -0.25, -0.50$ mag dex$^{-1}$被基准测试,并得到$μ_{0,{W_{VI}}} \simeq 24.39, 24.16, 23.93$ ($\pm0.07$)。相对于IC1613 TRGB和TRGB/JAGB距离的加权平均值$24.39^{+0.07}_{-0.04}$ (EDD) 和 $24.36\pm0.06$/$24.45\pm0.11$ (CCHP),较大的校正不被支持。需要更广泛的金属丰度基线来检验较小的校正(例如,$γ(W_{VI}) \lesssim -0.1$ mag dex$^{-1}$),同时获取额外的非Gaia视差,因为存在关于DR3的已发表问题(例如,关键的长周期造父变星S Vul, SV Vul)。

英文摘要:

18 HST parallaxes for Galactic classical Cepheids are unified to establish a Gaia-independent IC1613 distance and evaluate metallicity effect determinations, since the Gaia zeropoint is debated. Recently proposed classical Cepheid metallicity corrections of $γ(W_{VI}) \simeq 0, -0.25, -0.50$ mag dex$^{-1}$ are benchmarked, and yield $μ_{0,{W_{VI}}} \simeq 24.39, 24.16, 23.93$ ($\pm0.07$). Larger corrections are disfavored relative to a weighted mean of IC1613 TRGB and TRGB/JAGB distances of $24.39^{+0.07}_{-0.04}$ (EDD) and $24.36\pm0.06$/$24.45\pm0.11$ (CCHP). A more expansive metallicity baseline is desirable to scrutinize smaller corrections (e.g., $γ(W_{VI}) \lesssim -0.1$ mag dex$^{-1}$), while concurrently acquiring additional non-Gaia parallaxes since published concerns exist regarding DR3 (e.g., critical long-period Cepheids S Vul, SV Vul).

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑