谁的声音被听见？通过美国政府公开提交的材料映射利益相关者的AI观点
Whose Voice Counts? Mapping Stakeholder Perspectives on AI Through Public Submissions to the U.S. Government
AI总结：
本文通过分析美国政府AI行动计划公众咨询期间提交的信件，探讨不同利益相关者对AI的看法，发现个人更关注AI对生活的影响，而其他群体更关注AI发展，揭示了AI行动计划主要反映私营部门的关切。
摘要：
随着人工智能（AI）系统在日常生活中的普及，了解不同利益相关者如何理解和设想这些技术在塑造社会、政治和经济现实中的作用变得至关重要。本文基于特朗普政府AI行动计划公众咨询期间提交的信件语料库，调查公众对AI的看法。为此，我们发布了一个语料库清理流程，并通过主题建模和频率分析来探索不同子群体（如学术界、个人、私营部门）讨论的主要主题以及AI行动计划中出现的主题。我们的结果表明，个人对AI对生活的影响表达了强烈担忧，而其他利益相关者则更关注AI的发展。我们的主题比较显示，AI行动计划主要反映了私营部门对安全、政策和发展方面的关切，而个人的关切则代表性较低。
英文摘要：
As artificial intelligence (AI) systems become more common in our daily lives, it is important to understand how different stakeholders comprehend and envisage the role that these technologies play in shaping social, political, and economic realities. In this paper, we investigate public perceptions of AI based on a corpus of letters submitted during the public consultation for the Trump Administration's US AI Action Plan. To this aim, we release a corpus cleaning pipeline and perform topic modelling and frequency analysis to explore predominant topics discussed by different subgroups (e.g., academia, individuals, private sector) and those appearing in the AI Action Plan. Our results show that individuals voice strong concerns related to the impact of AI on life, while other stakeholders are more concerned with AI development. Our comparison of topics suggests that the AI Action Plan reflects predominantly the concerns of the private sector on security, policies, and development, with individuals' concerns less represented.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
