arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2605.20197cs.CL
收藏

MedicalBench: 评估大型语言模型以改进医疗概念提取

MedicalBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Toward Improved Medical Concept Extraction

Optum AI

Zhichao Yang, Gregory D. Lyng, Sanjit Singh Batra, Robert E. Tillman

AI总结:

本文提出MedicalBench,一个用于评估大型语言模型在医疗概念提取中的表现的基准,重点在于隐含概念的提取和证据 grounding,通过多阶段流程构建数据集并定义两种互补的评估任务,揭示了隐含概念提取的挑战。

摘要:

从电子健康记录中提取医疗概念是许多下游应用的基础,但具有挑战性,因为医疗上有意义的概念经常是隐含而非明确陈述的。现有的基准测试强调了在医疗文本中提取概念的重要性,但它们主要关注显式陈述的概念而非隐含概念。我们提出了MedicalBench,一个用于医疗概念提取的基准测试,其评估隐含医疗推理。MedicalBench将医疗概念提取视为对医疗笔记-概念对的验证任务,并结合句子层面的证据识别。该数据集基于MIMIC-IV出院摘要和经人类验证的ICD-10代码,通过多阶段大型语言模型(LLM)筛查流程、医疗注释和专家审核进行编纂。它故意包含隐含的正例、语义上易混淆的负例以及LLM判断与医学专家评估不一致的案例。我们定义了两种互补的评估任务:(1)医疗概念提取和(2)句子层面的证据检索,使能够评估正确性和可解释性。对最先进的LLM进行基准测试表明,性能仍然有限,突显了提取隐含表达概念的难度。我们进一步表明,性能在很大程度上不受笔记长度的影响,表明MedicalBench隔离了推理难度而不是表面混淆因素。MedicalBench为隐含、证据支持的医疗概念提取提供了首个系统性基准,为开发能够识别医学相关概念并以透明且医学忠实的方式做出预测的医学语言模型奠定了基础。

英文摘要:

Medical concept extraction from electronic health records underpins many downstream applications, yet remains challenging because medically meaningful concepts are frequently implied rather than explicitly stated in medical narratives. Existing benchmarks with human-annotated evidence spans underscore the importance of grounding extracted concepts in medical text. However, they predominantly focus on explicitly stated concepts instead of implicit concepts. We present MedicalBench, a benchmark for medical concept extraction with evidence grounding that evaluates implicit medical reasoning. MedicalBench formulates medical concept extraction as a verification task over medical note-concept pairs, coupled with sentence-level evidence identification. Built from MIMIC-IV discharge summaries and human-verified ICD-10 codes, the dataset is curated through a multi-stage large language model (LLM) triage pipeline followed by medical annotation and expert review. It deliberately includes implicit positives, semantically confusable negatives, and cases where LLM judgments disagree with medical expert assessments. We define two complementary evaluation tasks: (1) medical concept extraction and (2) sentence-level evidence retrieval, enabling assessment of both correctness and interpretability. Benchmarking state-of-the-art LLMs reveals that performance remains modest, highlighting the difficulty of extracting implicitly expressed concepts. We further show that performance is largely invariant to note length, indicating that MedicalBench isolates reasoning difficulty rather than superficial confounders. MedicalBench provides the first systematic benchmark for implicit, evidence-grounded medical concept extraction, offering a foundation for developing medical language models that can both identify medically relevant concepts and justify their predictions in a transparent and medically faithful manner.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑