arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2605.16737cs.ROcs.CV

DriveSafer: 结合安全指导的端到端自动驾驶

DriveSafer: End-to-End Autonomous Driving with Safety Guidance

Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学)

Shounak Sural, Raj Rajkumar

AI总结:

本文提出DriveSafer框架,通过减少致命性规划失败来提高端到端自动驾驶的安全性,而非单纯提升平均规划质量。

摘要:

端到端(E2E)自动驾驶模型近年来在性能上有了显著提升,尤其是在越来越具有挑战性的基准测试中。然而,现代生成式E2E规划器仍然在安全关键场景中存在大量致命性故障。我们发现许多此类故障源于物理约束和安全要求的违反,导致不安全行为。受此发现启发,本文专注于改进生成式端到端驾驶中的安全结果,通过有针对性地减少致命性规划失败,而不是提升平均规划质量。为此,我们提出了DriveSafer,一种面向失败的的安全框架,用于端到端规划器。DriveSafer通过利用训练时的安全约束和推理时的安全指导,明确引导生成式规划器朝向安全行为。与最先进的DiffusionDrive模型相比,在NAVSIM基准测试中,DriveSafer将致命性故障数量(PDMS=0)减少了48%,在可行驶区域合规性故障上减少了超过65%。

英文摘要:

End-to-End (E2E) autonomous driving models have shown growing capability in recent years, with performance improving on increasingly challenging benchmarks. However, modern generative E2E planners still suffer from a substantial number of catastrophic failures in safety-critical scenarios. We find that many such failures arise from violations of physical constraints and safety requirements, leading to unsafe behavior. Motivated by this finding, in this paper, we focus on improving safety outcomes in generative end-to-end driving with a targeted reduction of catastrophic planning failures, instead of enhancing average planning quality. Towards this end, we propose DriveSafer, a failure-aware safety framework for end-to-end planners. DriveSafer explicitly steers generative planners towards safe behaviors leveraging both training-time safety constraints and inference-time safety guidance. Compared to the state-of-the-art DiffusionDrive model, on the NAVSIM benchmark, DriveSafer reduces the number of catastrophic failures (PDMS=0) by 48%, with over 65% reduction in drivable-area compliance failures.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑