arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2605.16089cs.LGcs.AI

集中式与去中心化联邦学习:性能权衡分析

Centralized vs Decentralized Federated Learning: A trade-off performance analysis

University of Luxembourg(卢森堡大学)

Chaimaa Medjadji, Guilain Leduc, Sylvain Kubler, Yves Le Traon

AI总结:

本文通过Fedstellar模拟器、MNIST数据集和MLP分类器,对比分析集中式、去中心化和半去中心化联邦学习架构的性能权衡,揭示不同应用场景下的优劣势。

摘要:

联邦学习(FL)作为一种在分布式边缘设备上进行协作模型训练同时保护数据隐私的有前景范式,尤其在物联网设备数量激增的情况下显得尤为重要。然而,将如此大量的数据集中存储面临通信限制、隐私和法规等问题。FL可以是集中式(CFL)、去中心化(DFL)或半去中心化(SDFL)。选择合适的FL架构取决于应用需求。然而,非常少的研究通过实验比较了这三种架构,不仅为了理解各自的优势和局限性,还为了探讨不同性能指标之间的权衡。本文克服了这一分析的不足,利用Fedstellar模拟器、MNIST数据集和MLP分类器进行实验分析。

英文摘要:

Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a promising paradigm for collaborative model training across distributed edge devices while preserving data privacy especially with the huge increase amount of data due to the adoption of technologies which contributes to the growing number of IoT devices. Storing this amount of data centrally is challenging due to issues like limited communication, privacy, and regulations. FL can be Centralized (CFL), Decentralized (DFL), and Semi-decentralized (SDFL). Choosing the right FL architecture depends on the application's needs. However, very few research studies have experimentally compared these three types of architectures to not only understand the respective strengths and limitations, but also trade-offs between different performance indicators. This paper overcome this lack of analysis, conducting experimental analyses using the Fedstellar simulator, MNIST dataset, and MLP classifier.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑