arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2605.13889eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG

基于物理的对抗性染色增强与校准覆盖保证

Physics-Grounded Adversarial Stain Augmentation with Calibrated Coverage Guarantees

Mingi Hong

AI总结:

本文提出CASA方法,在Macenko染色参数空间中通过DKW不等式校准预算进行对抗性增强,提升多中心部署下的病理模型准确率。

摘要:

跨医院的染色差异会降低病理模型在部署时的性能。现有增强方法通过任意超参数扰动颜色空间,缺乏原理化的预算和对未见中心的覆盖保证。我们提出CASA,通过DKW不等式从多中心统计中校准预算,在Camelyon17-WILDS(5种子)上实现93.9%±1.6%的滑片级准确率,优于HED-strong、RandStainNA和ERM方法,且在所有10种比较方法中具有最高的最差组准确率。

英文摘要:

Stain variation across hospitals degrades histopathology models at deployment. Existing augmentation methods perturb color spaces with arbitrary hyperparameters, lacking both a principled budget and coverage guarantees for unseen centers. We propose \textbf{C}alibrated \textbf{A}dversarial \textbf{S}tain \textbf{A}ugmentation (\textbf{CASA}), which performs adversarial augmentation in the Macenko stain parameter space with a budget calibrated from multi-center statistics via the DKW inequality. On Camelyon17-WILDS (5 seeds), CASA achieves $93.9\% \pm 1.6\%$ slide-level accuracy -- outperforming HED-strong ($88.4\% \pm 7.3\%$), RandStainNA ($85.2\% \pm 6.7\%$), and ERM ($63.9\% \pm 11.3\%$) -- with the highest worst-group accuracy ($84.9\% \pm 0.9\%$) among all 10 compared methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑