arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2605.13450cs.AIcs.CLcs.HC

评估大语言模型的创造力:测试、限制与新前沿

Assessing the Creativity of Large Language Models: Testing, Limits, and New Frontiers

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign(伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校)

Samuel Schapiro, Alexi Gladstone, Jonah Black, Heng Ji

AI总结:

本文通过系统研究人类创造力测试对大语言模型创造力预测的有效性,发现不同构念测试效果差异显著,提出DRAT测试在预测科学构思能力上具有显著优势。

摘要:

测量大语言模型(LLMs)的创造力对于设计提升创造力的方法和增强对这一能力的科学理解至关重要。近年来,人们普遍将人类创造力测试应用于LLMs。尽管这些测试提供了一种便捷且全自动的评分方式,但其作为机器创造力测量的有效性尚未建立,且这些测试在预测人类创造力方面也已有限。为此,我们进行了首次大规模、系统性研究,评估人类创造力测试在预测LLMs在三个目标构念(创造性写作、发散思维和科学构思)中的创造性成就的有效性。我们发现,发散关联任务(DAT)和条件DAT分别是预测创造性写作和发散思维的最佳预测因子,但测试效果因构念而异,且无单一测试能预测所有构念。此外,与普遍观点相反,现有测试无法可靠预测科学构思能力。受此问题启发,我们引入了发散远程关联测试(DRAT),一种词汇空间测试,可在单一工具中评估发散和聚合思维。DRAT是首个且唯一的用于LLMs的创造力测试,能显著预测科学构思能力,展示了在主要设计选择上的稳健性。此外,DRAT的性能提升无法通过DAT和远程关联测试的线性组合恢复,表明在同一体验中评估发散和聚合思维对于可靠预测科学构思能力至关重要。

英文摘要:

Measuring the creativity of large language models (LLMs) is essential for designing methods that can improve creativity and for enhancing our scientific understanding of this ability. To accomplish this, it has become common in recent years to administer tests of human creativity to LLMs. Although these tests provide a convenient and fully automated way to score "creativity," their validity as measures of machine creativity has not been established, and these tests already have limited validity as predictors of human creativity. To address this problem, we conduct the first large-scale, systematic study assessing the effectiveness of human creativity tests for predicting the creative achievement of LLMs across three target constructs: creative writing, divergent thinking, and scientific ideation. We find that the Divergent Association Task (DAT) and the Conditional DAT are the best predictors of creative writing and divergent thinking, respectively, but that test effectiveness varies significantly by construct, and no single test predicts all constructs well. Moreover, contrary to popular belief, no existing test reliably predicts scientific ideation ability. Motivated by this problem, we introduce the Divergent Remote Association Test (DRAT), a vocabulary-space test that assesses both convergent and divergent thinking in a single instrument. The DRAT is the first and only creativity test for LLMs that is a significant predictor of scientific ideation ability, demonstrating robustness across major design choices. Furthermore, the performance gain of the DRAT is not recoverable from any linear combination of the Divergent Association Task and the Remote Associates Test, indicating that assessing divergent and convergent thinking in the same test is essential to reliably predicting scientific ideation ability.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑