arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2605.11632cs.CLcs.AI

Macro: 通过偏好对齐优化提升多语言反事实解释

Macro: Enhancing Multilingual Counterfactual Explanations through Alignment-as-Preference Optimization

Technische Universität Berlin(柏林技术大学);German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)(德国人工智能研究中心);University of Duisburg-Essen(杜伊斯堡- Essen大学);LMU Munich(慕尼黑大学);Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML)(慕尼黑机器学习中心);Saarland Informatics Campus(萨尔兰州信息学校区);BIFOLD – Berlin Institute for the Foundations of Learning and Data(柏林学习与数据基础研究院);Centre for European Research in Trusted AI (CERTAIN)(可信人工智能欧洲研究中心)

Yilong Wang, Qianli Wang, Bohao Chu, Yihong Liu, Jing Yang, Simon Ostermann

AI总结:

本文提出Macro框架,通过直接偏好优化改进多语言反事实解释,提升有效性的同时保持最小性,避免翻译基线的严重最小性问题,并在多个指标上优于监督微调方法。

摘要:

自我生成的反事实解释(SCEs)是大型语言模型(LLMs)生成的最小修改输入(minimality),通过翻转自身预测(validity)来揭示黑箱LLM行为,提供因果基础的解释方法。然而,将其扩展到非主导语言仍具挑战性:现有方法难以生成有效SCEs,且有效性与最小性之间的权衡影响解释质量。我们引入Macro,一种偏好对齐框架,通过直接偏好优化(DPO)进行多语言SCE生成,使用复合评分函数构建偏好对,将权衡转化为可测量的偏好信号。在四个LLM和七个语言类型多样的语言上进行实验,结果显示,Macro在平均情况下比链式思维基线提高了12.55%的有效性,同时不降低最小性,避免了翻译基线的严重最小性问题。与监督微调相比,Macro在两个指标上表现更优,证实了显式偏好优化对于平衡此权衡的重要性。进一步分析显示,Macro增强了跨语言扰动对齐并缓解了常见生成错误。我们的结果突显了偏好优化作为提升多语言模型解释的有前途方向。

英文摘要:

Self-generated counterfactual explanations (SCEs) are minimally modified inputs (minimality) generated by large language models (LLMs) that flip their own predictions (validity), offering a causally grounded approach to unraveling black-box LLM behavior. Yet extending them beyond English remains challenging: existing methods struggle to produce valid SCEs in non-dominant languages, and a persistent trade-off between validity and minimality undermines explanation quality. We introduce Macro, a preference alignment framework that applies Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to multilingual SCE generation, using a composite scoring function to construct preference pairs that effectively translate the trade-off into measurable preference signals. Experiments across four LLMs and seven typologically diverse languages show that Macro improves validity by 12.55\% on average over the chain-of-thought baseline without degrading minimality, while avoiding the severe minimality violations of the translation-based baseline. Compared to supervised fine-tuning, Macro achieves superior performance on both metrics, confirming that explicit preference optimization is essential for balancing this trade-off. Further analyses reveal that Macro increases cross-lingual perturbation alignment and mitigates common generation errors. Our results highlight preference optimization as a promising direction for enhancing multilingual model explanations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑