arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2605.07267cs.LG

PerCaM-Health:面向医疗推理的个性化动态因果图

PerCaM-Health: Personalized Dynamic Causal Graphs for Healthcare Reasoning

University of California, Irvine(加州大学尔湾分校);Washington University in St. Louis(圣路易斯华盛顿大学)

Elahe Khatibi, Ziyu Wang, Saba A. Farahani, Di Huang, Hung Cao, Ramesh Jain, Amir M. Rahmani

AI总结:

本文提出PerCaM-Health框架,通过学习纵向健康数据中的个性化动态因果图,提升医疗干预推理的可靠性与可解释性。

摘要:

个性化医疗决策需要推理生理和行为变量如何随时间影响个体患者。现有时间因果发现方法难以满足这一需求:群体级模型提供稳定但非个性化的结构,而单患者发现不可靠,因为个体轨迹短、噪声大、不规则且非平稳。本文引入PerCaM-Health框架,从纵向健康数据中学习个性化动态因果图。该框架首先学习知识引导的群体时间图,然后保守地适应和进化该图,利用患者特定的时间证据和滑动窗口更新,生成可解释且可审计的图序列。通过将这些图与时间结构方程结合,该框架使患者层面的反事实查询成为可能,例如估计在假设行为干预下的短期结果变化。实验表明,PerCaM-Health在图恢复、动态边跟踪和干预方向准确性方面优于群体级、单患者和非个性化时间基线。这些结果表明,联合建模个性化和时间演进能产生更可靠的因果结构和干预推理。

英文摘要:

Personalized healthcare decisions require reasoning about how physiological and behavioral variables influence an individual patient over time. Existing temporal causal discovery methods are poorly matched to this setting: cohort-level models provide stable but non-personalized structures, while per-patient discovery is unreliable because individual trajectories are short, noisy, irregular, and non-stationary. This creates a fundamental gap between population-level causal modeling and the patient-specific, time-varying mechanisms needed for intervention reasoning. We introduce PerCaM-Health, a framework for learning personalized dynamic causal graphs from longitudinal health data. The framework learns a knowledge-guided population temporal graph, then conservatively adapts and evolves it using patient-specific temporal evidence and rolling-window updates, producing interpretable and auditable graph sequences. By coupling these graphs with temporal structural equations, the framework enables patient-level counterfactual queries, such as estimating short-horizon outcome changes under hypothetical behavioral interventions. Experiments on a semi-synthetic dynamic health benchmark show that PerCaM-Health improves graph recovery, dynamic edge tracking, and intervention direction accuracy compared to cohort-level, per-patient, and non-personalized temporal baselines. These results demonstrate that jointly modeling personalization and temporal evolution yields more reliable causal structure and intervention reasoning.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑