arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2605.06751cs.ITcs.CRmath.IT
收藏

密码学与信息论安全容量用于一般任意变化窃密信道

Cryptographic and Information-theoretic Security Capacities for General Arbitrarily Varying Wiretap Channels

Technical University of Munich(慕尼黑工业大学);ShanghaiTech University(上海科技大学);T-Labs, Deutsche Telekom AG(德意志电信股份公司 T-Labs)

Holger Boche, Ning Cai, Yiqi Chen, Marc Geitz

AI总结:

本文比较了任意变化窃密信道与一般任意变化窃密信道在语义安全约束下的安全容量,证明了在特定条件下强安全容量与语义安全容量相等。

摘要:

我们比较了任意变化窃密信道(AVWC)和一般任意变化窃密信道(GAVWC)在强安全性和语义安全约束下的容量。结果表明,AVWC的平均误差和强安全容量始终等于其最大误差和语义安全容量。然而,这种等价性不适用于所有通信系统,我们通过反例证明了这一点。我们还显示,对于GAVWC,语义安全性和其他密码安全措施达到相同的容量值。最后,我们界定了GAVWC强安全容量与语义安全容量之间的差距。当窃贼的选择是子双指数函数相对于块长度n时,该差距消失,从而给出了GAVWC强安全和语义安全容量相等的充分条件。

英文摘要:

We compare the strong secrecy capacities of Arbitrarily Varying Wiretap Channels (AVWCs) and General Arbitrarily Varying Wiretap Channels (GAVWCs) with their capacities under semantic secrecy constraint and other equivalent cryptographic secrecy constraints. It turns out that the average error and strong secrecy capacity of an AVWC is always equal to its maximal error and semantic secrecy capacity. However, this equivalence does not hold for all general communication systems, and we prove this by a counterexample. We also show that, for the GAVWC, semantic security and the other cryptographic security measures considered achieve the same capacity values. Finally, we bound the gap between the strong secrecy capacity and the semantic secrecy capacity for the GAVWC. The gap vanishes if the choice of the jammer is sub-double-exponential with respect to the block length n, which gives a sufficient condition for the strong and semantic secrecy capacities to be equal for GAVWCs.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑