arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2605.06643cs.CVcs.AIcs.LGcs.MM
收藏

我们是否在多模态领域泛化中取得进展?一个全面的基准研究

Are We Making Progress in Multimodal Domain Generalization? A Comprehensive Benchmark Study

ETH Zürich(苏黎世联邦理工学院);Zhengzhou University(郑州大学);MBZUAI(马克斯·普朗克人工智能研究所);EPFL(苏黎世联邦理工学院)

Hao Dong, Hongzhao Li, Shupan Li, Muhammad Haris Khan, Eleni Chatzi, Olga Fink

AI总结:

本文通过MMDG-Bench基准测试,评估了多模态领域泛化方法的有效性,发现现有方法在公平比较下进步有限,且存在领域和模态配置差异,揭示了领域泛化仍需进一步改进。

摘要:

尽管多模态领域泛化(MMDG)在增强模型鲁棒性方面日益流行,但其性能提升是否反映真正的算法进步仍不明确。当前研究碎片化,不同数据集、模态配置和实验设置差异显著。现有基准主要关注动作识别,忽略了输入损坏、缺失模态和模型可信度等现实挑战。为此,本文引入MMDG-Bench,首个统一且全面的MMDG基准,涵盖六个数据集、三个任务:动作识别、机械故障诊断和情感分析。MMDG-Bench包含六种模态组合、九种代表性方法和多种评估设置。除标准准确率外,还系统评估了抗损坏性、缺失模态泛化、误分类检测和分布外检测。通过训练7,402个神经网络完成95个跨领域任务,得出五个关键结论:(1)公平比较下,最新专用MMDG方法仅在ERM基线上有微小提升;(2)无单一方法在所有数据集或模态组合中表现最佳;(3)与上界性能仍有显著差距,表明MMDG仍远未解决;(4)三模态融合不总优于最强双模态配置;(5)所有评估方法在损坏和缺失模态场景下均显著退化,部分方法进一步损害模型可信度。

英文摘要:

Despite the growing popularity of Multimodal Domain Generalization (MMDG) for enhancing model robustness, it remains unclear whether reported performance gains reflect genuine algorithmic progress or are artifacts of inconsistent evaluation protocols. Current research is fragmented, with studies varying significantly across datasets, modality configurations, and experimental settings. Furthermore, existing benchmarks focus predominantly on action recognition, often neglecting critical real-world challenges such as input corruptions, missing modalities, and model trustworthiness. This lack of standardization obscures a reliable assessment of the field's advancement. To address this issue, we introduce MMDG-Bench, the first unified and comprehensive benchmark for MMDG, which standardizes evaluation across six datasets spanning three diverse tasks: action recognition, mechanical fault diagnosis, and sentiment analysis. MMDG-Bench encompasses six modality combinations, nine representative methods, and multiple evaluation settings. Beyond standard accuracy, it systematically assesses corruption robustness, missing-modality generalization, misclassification detection, and out-of-distribution detection. With 7, 402 neural networks trained in total across 95 unique cross-domain tasks, MMDG-Bench yields five key findings: (1) under fair comparisons, recent specialized MMDG methods offer only marginal improvements over ERM baseline; (2) no single method consistently outperforms others across datasets or modality combinations; (3) a substantial gap to upper-bound performance persists, indicating that MMDG remains far from solved; (4) trimodal fusion does not consistently outperform the strongest bimodal configurations; and (5) all evaluated methods exhibit significant degradation under corruption and missing-modality scenarios, with some methods further compromising model trustworthiness.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑