arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2604.22722cs.IRcs.AIcs.LG

通过蒸馏将稠密检索器与LLM效用对齐

Aligning Dense Retrievers with LLM Utility via Distillation

Dalhousie University(达尔豪西大学)

Rajinder Sandhu, Di Mu, Cheng Chang, Md Shahriar Tasjid, Himanshu Rai, Maksims Volkovs, Ga Wu

AI总结:

提出Utility-Aligned Embeddings (UAE)框架,通过蒸馏LLM的困惑度降低效用分布来训练双编码器,在不增加测试时LLM推理开销的情况下提升稠密检索的精度和效率。

摘要:

稠密向量检索是检索增强生成(RAG)的实用支柱,但相似性搜索可能受限于精度。相反,利用LLM重排序的基于效用的方法通常能实现更优性能,但计算成本高且易受困惑度估计中固有噪声的影响。我们提出Utility-Aligned Embeddings (UAE),一个旨在将这些优势融合为实用、高性能检索方法的框架。我们将检索表述为分布匹配问题,使用Utility-Modulated InfoNCE目标训练双编码器以模仿由困惑度降低导出的效用分布。该方法将分级效用信号直接注入嵌入空间,无需测试时LLM推理。在QASPER基准上,UAE在召回率@1上提升30.59%,MAP提升30.16%,Token F1提升17.3%,优于强语义基线BGE-Base。关键的是,UAE比高效的LLM重排序方法快180倍以上,同时保持竞争性能,表明将检索与生成效用对齐能在规模上产生可靠的上下文。

英文摘要:

Dense vector retrieval is the practical backbone of Retrieval- Augmented Generation (RAG), but similarity search can suffer from precision limitations. Conversely, utility-based approaches leveraging LLM re-ranking often achieve superior performance but are computationally prohibitive and prone to noise inherent in perplexity estimation. We propose Utility-Aligned Embeddings (UAE), a framework designed to merge these advantages into a practical, high-performance retrieval method. We formulate retrieval as a distribution matching problem, training a bi-encoder to imitate a utility distribution derived from perplexity reduction using a Utility-Modulated InfoNCE objective. This approach injects graded utility signals directly into the embedding space without requiring test-time LLM inference. On the QASPER benchmark, UAE improves retrieval Recall@1 by 30.59%, MAP by 30.16% and Token F1 by 17.3% over the strong semantic baseline BGE-Base. Crucially, UAE is over 180x faster than the efficient LLM re-ranking methods preserving competitive performance, demonstrating that aligning retrieval with generative utility yields reliable contexts at scale.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑