arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2604.22158math.OCcs.LG

安全学习基于控制的约束线性二次调节器的最优速率后悔

Rate-Optimal Regret for the Safe Learning-based Control of the Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulator

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California Santa Barbara(加州大学圣芭芭拉分校电气与计算机工程系)

Spencer Hutchinson, Nanfei Jiang, Mahnoosh Alizadeh

AI总结:

研究了具有时间步必须满足的约束的随机线性二次调节器(LQR)自适应控制问题,提出通过SDP选择乐观策略并进行缩放以确保安全,证明了在约束LQR设置中可实现O(√T)的后悔和概率约束。

摘要:

我们研究了具有在每个时间步必须满足的约束的随机线性二次调节器(LQR)自适应控制问题。先前多维问题的工作显示了O(T^{2/3})的后悔和鲁棒约束的满足,留有开放的问题是是否可以在约束LQR设置中实现O(√T)的后悔。我们通过证明O(√T)的后悔和概率约束的满足来贡献此问题。我们的算法使用SDP选择乐观策略,然后“缩放回”该策略直到可以验证安全。我们的理论分析通过一个关键引理来建立后悔和约束保证,该引理将系统协方差与所选策略联系起来。这种基于协方差的分析与通常用于自适应LQR的基于成本到去的分析形成对比。

英文摘要:

We study the problem of adaptive control of the stochastic linear quadratic regulator (LQR) with constraints that must be satisfied at every time step. Prior work on the multidimensional problem has shown $\tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ regret and satisfaction of robust constraints, leaving open the question of whether $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret can be attained in the constrained LQR setting. We contribute to this problem by showing $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret and satisfaction of chance constraints. This type of constraints allow us to handle unbounded noise and also enable analytical techniques not directly applicable to robust constraints. Our proposed algorithm for this problem uses an SDP to select an optimistic policy, and then "scales back" this policy until it is verifiably-safe. Our theoretical analysis establishes regret and constraint guarantees via a key lemma that bounds the system covariance in terms of the chosen policy. This covariance-based analysis is in contrast with the cost-to-go based analysis that is typically used in adaptive LQR.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑