arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2604.21481cs.CL

语音优先的印度语言国家偏好:面向印度语言TTS的大规模成对评估与偏好分析

Preferences of a Voice-First Nation: Large-Scale Pairwise Evaluation and Preference Analysis for TTS in Indian Languages

Indian Institute of Technology, Madras, India(印度理工学院马德拉斯分校);AI4Bharat, India(AI4Bharat);Josh Talks, India(Josh Talks)
Srija Anand, Ashwin Sankar, Ishvinder Sethi, Aaditya Pareek, Kartik Rajput, Gaurav Yadav, Nikhil Narasimhan, Adish Pandya, Deepon Halder, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahma… 展开作者

Srija Anand, Ashwin Sankar, Ishvinder Sethi, Aaditya Pareek, Kartik Rajput, Gaurav Yadav, Nikhil Narasimhan, Adish Pandya, Deepon Halder, Mohammed Safi Ur Rahman Khan, Praveen S, Shobhit Banga, Mitesh M Khapra

AI总结:

本文通过大规模成对评估和分析,探讨印度语言TTS系统在多语言环境下的偏好,结合语言控制与感知注解,评估7种先进系统,揭示人类偏好与模型性能的多维关系。

摘要:

众包成对评估已成为评估基础模型的可扩展方法。然而,将其应用于文本到语音(TTS)时,由于语言多样性及语音感知的多维特性,引入了高方差。我们提出了一种受控的多维成对评估框架,用于多语言TTS,结合语言控制与感知导向的注解。使用5000+个本地和混合语言句子,覆盖10种印度语言,评估7种最先进的TTS系统,并从1900名本地评估者中收集超过120,000次成对比较。除了总体偏好外,评估者还提供了六个感知维度的判断:可理解性、表现力、声音质量、活力、噪声和幻觉。使用Bradley-Terry建模,我们构建了多语言排行榜,通过SHAP分析解释人类偏好,并分析排行榜的可靠性以及模型在感知维度上的优势与权衡。

英文摘要:

Crowdsourced pairwise evaluation has emerged as a scalable approach for assessing foundation models. However, applying it to Text to Speech(TTS) introduces high variance due to linguistic diversity and multidimensional nature of speech perception. We present a controlled multidimensional pairwise evaluation framework for multilingual TTS that combines linguistic control with perceptually grounded annotation. Using 5K+ native and code-mixed sentences across 10 Indic languages, we evaluate 7 state-of-the-art TTS systems and collect over 120K pairwise comparisons from over 1900 native raters. In addition to overall preference, raters provide judgments across 6 perceptual dimensions: intelligibility, expressiveness, voice quality, liveliness, noise, and hallucinations. Using Bradley-Terry modeling, we construct a multilingual leaderboard, interpret human preference using SHAP analysis and analyze leaderboard reliability alongside model strengths and trade-offs across perceptual dimensions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑