arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2604.20544cs.CVcs.AI

Evian:迈向可解释的视觉指令微调数据审计

Evian: Towards Explainable Visual Instruction-tuning Data Auditing

The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou)(香港科技大学(广州));ByteDance Seed(字节跳动种子)

Zimu Jia, Mingjie Xu, Andrew Estornell, Jiaheng Wei

AI总结:

本文提出Evian框架,通过分解评估模型响应的三大认知组件,解决数据审计中逻辑一致性与事实准确性不足的问题,验证高质量小规模数据优于大规模低质量数据。

摘要:

大型视觉-语言模型(LVLMs)的效果严重依赖于训练数据质量,需在视觉真实性和指令遵循能力间取得平衡。现有数据集质量不一致,现有过滤方法缺乏识别逻辑谬误或事实错误的粒度。为此,我们提出三个贡献:首先构建包含300,000样本的基准测试集,系统注入多样细微缺陷;其次引入

英文摘要:

The efficacy of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) is critically dependent on the quality of their training data, requiring a precise balance between visual fidelity and instruction-following capability. Existing datasets, however, are plagued by inconsistent quality, and current data filtering methods rely on coarse-grained scores that lack the granularity to identify nuanced semantic flaws like logical fallacies or factual errors. This creates a fundamental bottleneck in developing more reliable models. To address this, we make three core contributions. First, we construct a large-scale, 300K-sample benchmark by systematically injecting diverse, subtle defects to provide a challenging testbed for data auditing. Second, we introduce a novel "Decomposition-then-Evaluation" paradigm that breaks model responses into constituent cognitive components: visual description, subjective inference, and factual claim, enabling targeted analysis. Third, we instantiate this paradigm via EVIAN (Explainable Visual Instruction-tuning Data AuditiNg), an automated framework that evaluates these components along the orthogonal axes of Image-Text Consistency, Logical Coherence, and Factual Accuracy. Our empirical findings challenge the prevailing scale-centric paradigm: a model fine-tuned on a compact, high-quality subset curated by EVIAN consistently surpassed models trained on orders-of-magnitude larger datasets. We also reveal that dividing complex auditing into verifiable subtasks enables robust curation, and that Logical Coherence is the most critical factor in data quality evaluation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑