arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2604.20225cs.CL

高 Yao 基准:评估大型语言模型多语言和多文化能力的综合框架

The GaoYao Benchmark: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Multilingual and Multicultural Abilities of Large Language Models

Huawei, China(华为,中国);Fudan University, China(复旦大学,中国)
Yilun Liu, Chunguang Zhao, Mengyao Piao, Lingqi Miao, Shimin Tao, Minggui He, Chenxin Liu, Li Zhang, Hongxia Ma, Jiaxin Guo, Chen Liu, Liqun Deng, Jiansheng Wei… 展开作者

Yilun Liu, Chunguang Zhao, Mengyao Piao, Lingqi Miao, Shimin Tao, Minggui He, Chenxin Liu, Li Zhang, Hongxia Ma, Jiaxin Guo, Chen Liu, Liqun Deng, Jiansheng Wei, Xiaojun Meng, Fanyi Du, Daimeng Wei, Yanghua Xiao

AI总结:

本文提出GaoYao基准,通过182300个样本、26种语言和51个地区,评估大型语言模型的多语言和多文化能力,揭示地理性能差异和任务间差距。

摘要:

评估大型语言模型(LLMs)的多语言和多文化能力对其实用性至关重要。然而,当前基准面临三个关键限制:(1)碎片化的评估维度常忽视深层文化细微差别;(2)依赖低质量机器翻译的主观任务语言覆盖不足;(3)分析浅显,缺乏超越简单排名的诊断深度。为此,我们引入GaoYao,一个包含182300个样本、26种语言和51个地区/区域的综合基准。首先,GaoYao提出一个统一框架,将评估任务分为三个文化层(通用多语言、跨文化、单一文化)和九个认知子层。其次,我们通过专家严格本地化主观基准至19种语言,并合成跨文化测试集至34种文化,覆盖范围超过先前111%。第三,我们对20多种旗舰和紧凑型LLM进行了深入诊断分析。我们的发现揭示了显著的地理性能差异和任务间的明显差距,为未来工作提供了可靠的地图。我们发布了该基准(https://github.com/lunyiliu/GaoYao)

英文摘要:

Evaluating the multilingual and multicultural capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) is essential for their global utility. However, current benchmarks face three critical limitations: (1) fragmented evaluation dimensions that often neglect deep cultural nuances; (2) insufficient language coverage in subjective tasks relying on low-quality machine translation; and (3) shallow analysis that lacks diagnostic depth beyond simple rankings. To address these, we introduce GaoYao, a comprehensive benchmark with 182.3k samples, 26 languages and 51 nations/areas. First, GaoYao proposes a unified framework categorizing evaluation tasks into three cultural layers (General Multilingual, Cross-cultural, Monocultural) and nine cognitive sub-layers. Second, we achieve native-quality expansion by leveraging experts to rigorously localize subjective benchmarks into 19 languages and synthesizing cross-cultural test sets for 34 cultures, surpassing prior coverage by up to 111%. Third, we conduct an in-depth diagnostic analysis on 20+ flagship and compact LLMs. Our findings reveal significant geographical performance disparities and distinct gaps between tasks, offering a reliable map for future work. We release the benchmark (https://github.com/lunyiliu/GaoYao).

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑