arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2604.20006cs.CL

从回忆到遗忘:个性化代理长期记忆的基准测试

From Recall to Forgetting: Benchmarking Long-Term Memory for Personalized Agents

Arizona State University(亚利桑那州立大学);Genies;University of Arizona(亚利桑那大学)

Md Nayem Uddin, Kumar Shubham, Eduardo Blanco, Chitta Baral, Gengyu Wang

AI总结:

本文提出Memora基准测试,评估个性化代理在长期对话中的记忆、推理和推荐能力,引入FAMA指标以衡量对过时记忆的依赖,发现LLM和记忆代理在处理长期记忆时存在显著不足。

摘要:

个性化代理在长期交互中需维持跨会话的持久记忆并随情境变化更新。然而现有基准多将长期记忆评估视为从过去对话中检索事实,限制了对代理随时间巩固记忆或处理频繁知识更新能力的洞察。本文引入Memora,一个覆盖数周至数月用户对话的长期记忆基准,评估三个记忆基础任务:记忆、推理和推荐。为确保数据质量,我们采用自动化记忆基础检查和人工评估。我们进一步引入遗忘意识记忆准确率(FAMA)指标,该指标在评估长期记忆时惩罚对过时或无效记忆的依赖。对四个LLM和六个记忆代理的评估显示,频繁重用无效记忆和未能协调演变记忆的问题普遍存在。记忆代理提供微小改进,揭示了个性化代理在长期记忆方面的不足。

英文摘要:

Personalized agents that interact with users over long periods must maintain persistent memory across sessions and update it as circumstances change. However, existing benchmarks predominantly frame long-term memory evaluation as fact retrieval from past conversations, providing limited insight into agents' ability to consolidate memory over time or handle frequent knowledge updates. We introduce Memora, a long-term memory benchmark spanning weeks to months long user conversations. The benchmark evaluates three memory-grounded tasks: remembering, reasoning, and recommending. To ensure data quality, we employ automated memory-grounding checks and human evaluation. We further introduce Forgetting-Aware Memory Accuracy (FAMA), a metric that penalizes reliance on obsolete or invalidated memory when evaluating long-term memory. Evaluations of four LLMs and six memory agents reveal frequent reuse of invalid memories and failures to reconcile evolving memories. Memory agents offer marginal improvements, exposing shortcomings in long-term memory for personalized agents.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑