arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2604.18052cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
收藏

ExAI5G:一种用于5G网络入侵检测的基于逻辑的可解释人工智能框架

ExAI5G: A Logic-Based Explainable AI Framework for Intrusion Detection in 5G Networks

organization= Faculty of Information Technology;Electrical Engineering, University of Oulu , addressline= , city= Oulu , postcode= 90570 , state= , country= Finland

Saeid Sheikhi, Panos Kostakos, Lauri Loven

AI总结:

本文提出ExAI5G框架,结合Transformer深度学习与逻辑可解释AI技术,实现高精度且透明的入侵检测,通过逻辑规则提取和解释评估方法,达到99.9%准确率和0.854宏F1分数,展示出模型推理的透明性。

摘要:

针对5G网络复杂高流量的入侵检测需求,本文提出ExAI5G框架,整合Transformer深度学习模型与基于逻辑的可解释AI技术。框架利用集成梯度法确定特征重要性,并提取替代决策树以推导逻辑规则。引入新的评估方法评估LLM生成的解释,使用强大评估器LLM评估可操作性并测量语义相似性和忠实度。在5G物联网入侵数据集上,系统达到99.9%的准确率和0.854宏F1分数,提取出16条逻辑规则,忠实度达99.7%。评估表明现代LLM能生成既忠实又可操作的解释,表明无需牺牲性能即可构建可信高效的入侵检测系统。

英文摘要:

Intrusion detection systems (IDSs) for 5G networks must handle complex, high-volume traffic. Although opaque "black-box" models can achieve high accuracy, their lack of transparency hinders trust and effective operational response. We propose ExAI5G, a framework that prioritizes interpretability by integrating a Transformer-based deep learning IDS with logic-based explainable AI (XAI) techniques. The framework uses Integrated Gradients to attribute feature importance and extracts a surrogate decision tree to derive logical rules. We introduce a novel evaluation methodology for LLM-generated explanations, using a powerful evaluator LLM to assess actionability and measuring their semantic similarity and faithfulness. On a 5G IoT intrusion dataset, our system achieves 99.9\% accuracy and a 0.854 macro F1-score, demonstrating strong performance. More importantly, we extract 16 logical rules with 99.7\% fidelity, making the model's reasoning transparent. The evaluation demonstrates that modern LLMs can generate explanations that are both faithful and actionable, indicating that it is possible to build a trustworthy and effective IDS without compromising performance for the sake of marginal gains from an opaque model.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑