arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2604.10217cs.CV

预训练图像匹配器在SAR-光学卫星配准中表现如何?

Are Pretrained Image Matchers Good Enough for SAR-Optical Satellite Registration?

Taylor Geospatial(泰勒地理空间公司);Independent Researcher(独立研究者)

Isaac Corley, Alex Stoken, Gabriele Berton

AI总结:

本文评估了24种预训练匹配器在跨模态卫星配准中的表现,发现显式跨模态训练并非必然提升性能,且部署协议对精度影响显著。

摘要:

跨模态光学-雷达(SAR)配准是遥感灾害响应的瓶颈,但现代图像匹配器几乎全部在自然图像领域开发和评估。我们评估了24种预训练匹配器,在零样本设置下不进行微调或领域适应,于SpaceNet9及两个额外的跨模态基准上,采用确定性协议、拼接大图像推理、稳健几何过滤和地标地基指标。结果揭示了不对称迁移——具有显式跨模态训练的匹配器并不总是优于无此类训练的匹配器。虽然XoFTR(训练用于可见-热匹配)和RoMa在标记的SpaceNet9训练场景中实现了最低报告的均误差3.0像素,但RoMa在没有任何跨模态训练的情况下达到此水平,而MatchAnything-ELoFTR(3.4像素)——在合成跨模态对上训练——表现接近,表明(作为工作假设)基础模型特征(DINOv2)可能对模态不变性做出贡献,部分替代了显式跨模态监督。3D重建匹配器(MASt3R,DUSt3R)并非为传统2D图像匹配设计,对协议敏感且在默认设置下仍脆弱。部署协议选择(几何模型、拼接大小、内点门控)会使单个匹配器的精度变化高达33倍,有时超过在评估范围内完全更换匹配器的效果——仅使用仿射几何即可将均误差从12.34像素降至9.74像素。这些发现既指导现有匹配器的实际部署,也影响未来跨模态卫星配准匹配器的设计。

英文摘要:

Cross-modal optical--SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) registration is a bottleneck in remote-sensing disaster response. Modern image matchers are developed and benchmarked almost exclusively on natural-image domains. We evaluate twenty-four pretrained matcher configurations in a zero-shot setting, with no fine-tuning or domain adaptation on satellite or SAR data. The evaluation spans SpaceNet9 and two additional cross-modal benchmarks under a deterministic protocol that uses tiled large-image inference, robust geometric filtering, and tie-point-grounded metrics. Our results show uneven transfer: matchers with explicit cross-modal training do not uniformly outperform those without it. XoFTR (trained for visible--thermal matching) and RoMa achieve the lowest reported mean tie-point error at $3.0$ px on the labeled SpaceNet9 training scenes. RoMa achieves this result \emph{without any cross-modal training}. MatchAnything-ELoFTR ($3.4$ px), trained on synthetic cross-modal pairs, is close behind. XoFTR also runs roughly an order of magnitude faster than the RoMa family ($0.4$ s vs. $5.0$ s per pair). RoMa's performance is consistent with the hypothesis that frozen DINOv2 features confer robustness to large appearance shifts. Deployment protocol choices (geometry model, tile size, inlier gating) change mean error by up to $33\times$ for a single matcher. This shift can exceed the effect of swapping matchers within our evaluated protocol ablations. Affine geometry alone reduces mean error from $12.3$ to $9.7$ px.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑