arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2604.08062cs.HCcs.AI

从注视到引导:通过多模态注视感知AI助手解读和适应用户认知需求

From Gaze to Guidance: Interpreting and Adapting to Users' Cognitive Needs with Multimodal Gaze-Aware AI Assistants

Microsoft Research(微软研究院);MIT Media Lab(麻省理工学院媒体实验室)

Valdemar Danry, Javier Hernandez, Andrew Wilson, Pattie Maes, Judith Amores

AI总结:

本文提出一种基于注视的多模态LLM助手,通过眼动追踪提升用户阅读行为评估的准确性与个性化,实验表明其能有效提升信息回忆能力并提高交互效率。

摘要:

当前LLM助手在回答问题方面表现强大,但缺乏揭示用户挣扎时刻和地点的行为上下文。我们提出一种基于注视的多模态LLM助手,利用第一人称视频与注视叠加来识别可能的困难点并提供后续回顾帮助。在36人的受控研究中,与纯文本LLM助手相比,注视感知助手在评估用户阅读行为的准确性与个性化方面显著优于传统LLM助手,并显著提升了用户的信息回忆能力。用户与注视感知助手交流的词数显著减少,表明交互更高效。定性结果强调了在理解方面感知益处和在注视行为解读不准确时的挑战。我们的发现表明,注视感知LLM助手能够推理认知需求以改善用户认知成果。

英文摘要:

Current LLM assistants are powerful at answering questions, but they have limited access to the behavioral context that reveals when and where a user is struggling. We present a gaze-grounded multimodal LLM assistant that uses egocentric video with gaze overlays to identify likely points of difficulty and target follow-up retrospective assistance. We instantiate this vision in a controlled study (n=36) comparing the gaze-aware AI assistant to a text-only LLM assistant. Compared to a conventional LLM assistant, the gaze-aware assistant was rated as significantly more accurate and personalized in its assessments of users' reading behavior and significantly improved people's ability to recall information. Users spoke significantly fewer words with the gaze-aware assistant, indicating more efficient interactions. Qualitative results underscored both perceived benefits in comprehension and challenges when interpretations of gaze behaviors were inaccurate. Our findings suggest that gaze-aware LLM assistants can reason about cognitive needs to improve cognitive outcomes of users.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑