arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2604.07057cs.CL

IndoBERT-Sentiment:面向印度尼西亚文本的上下文条件情感分类

IndoBERT-Sentiment: Context-Conditioned Sentiment Classification for Indonesian Text

SocialX;Center of Excellence SAKTI, Research Institute Intelligent Business & Sustainable Economy, Telkom University(卓越中心SAKTI,智能商业与可持续经济研究所,Telkom大学);Biomedical Engineering Study Program, School of Electrical Engineering, Telkom University(生物医学工程研究项目,电气工程学院,Telkom大学);Research Center for Smart Mechatronics, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN)(智能机电一体化研究中心,国家研究与创新署(BRIN))

Muhammad Apriandito Arya Saputra, Andry Alamsyah, Dian Puteri Ramadhani, Thomhert Suprapto Siadari, Hanif Fakhrurroja

AI总结:

本文提出IndoBERT-Sentiment模型,通过结合上下文和文本进行情感分类,提升印度尼西亚文本的情感识别准确率。

摘要:

现有印度尼西亚情感分析模型在孤立分类时忽略上下文,而本文引入IndoBERT-Sentiment,通过结合上下文和文本进行情感分类,使预测基于讨论的主题。该模型基于IndoBERT Large(335M参数)训练于31,360个上下文-文本对,覆盖188个主题,达到F1宏平均0.856和准确率88.1%。在与三种通用印度尼西亚情感模型的对比测试中,IndoBERT-Sentiment在F1上领先基线35.6点。我们证明上下文条件化在相关性分类中已有效转移至情感分析,使模型能正确分类上下文无关方法系统性误判的文本。

英文摘要:

Existing Indonesian sentiment analysis models classify text in isolation, ignoring the topical context that often determines whether a statement is positive, negative, or neutral. We introduce IndoBERT-Sentiment, a context-conditioned sentiment classifier that takes both a topical context and a text as input, producing sentiment predictions grounded in the topic being discussed. Built on IndoBERT Large (335M parameters) and trained on 31,360 context-text pairs labeled across 188 topics, the model achieves an F1 macro of 0.856 and accuracy of 88.1%. In a head-to-head evaluation against three widely used general-purpose Indonesian sentiment models on the same test set, IndoBERT-Sentiment outperforms the best baseline by 35.6 F1 points. We show that context-conditioning, previously demonstrated for relevancy classification, transfers effectively to sentiment analysis and enables the model to correctly classify texts that are systematically misclassified by context-free approaches.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑