在回答前观看:从视觉引导的后训练中学习
Watch Before You Answer: Learning from Visually Grounded Post-Training
AI总结:
本文发现现有视频理解基准中40-60%的问题可通过文本线索回答,提出VidGround方法通过仅使用视觉引导问题提升VLM性能,实验显示其在后训练中效果优于复杂方法。
摘要:
对于视觉-语言模型(VLMs)来说,全面理解视觉、时间与文本线索至关重要。然而,尽管多模态建模取得进展,视频理解性能仍落后于基于文本的推理。本文发现进展甚至比预期更差:广泛报告的长视频理解基准中40-60%的问题可通过文本线索单独回答。此外,这些问题也普遍存在在广泛使用的后训练数据集中,可能削弱后训练提升VLM视频理解性能的能力。受此观察启发,我们引入VidGround作为简单有效的解决方案:仅使用实际视觉引导问题进行后训练。当与基于强化学习的后训练算法结合使用时,该简单技术可将性能提升6.2个点,仅使用原始数据集的69.1%。此外,我们展示数据整理与简单后训练算法优于复杂方法,表明数据质量是提升VLM视频理解能力的主要瓶颈。这些结果强调了整理后训练数据和评估基准的重要性,以推动更强大VLM的发展。项目页面:http://vidground.etuagi.com。
英文摘要:
It is critical for vision-language models (VLMs) to comprehensively understand visual, temporal, and textual cues. However, despite rapid progress in multimodal modeling, video understanding performance still lags behind text-based reasoning. In this work, we find that progress is even worse than previously assumed: commonly reported long video understanding benchmarks contain 40-60% of questions that can be answered using text cues alone. Furthermore, we find that these issues are also pervasive in widely used post-training datasets, potentially undercutting the ability of post-training to improve VLM video understanding performance. Guided by this observation, we introduce VidGround as a simple yet effective solution: using only the actual visually grounded questions without any linguistic biases for post-training. When used in tandem with RL-based post-training algorithms, this simple technique improves performance by up to 6.2 points relative to using the full dataset, while using only 69.1% of the original post-training data. Moreover, we show that data curation with a simple post-training algorithm outperforms several more complex post-training techniques, highlighting that data quality is a major bottleneck for improving video understanding in VLMs. These results underscore the importance of curating post-training data and evaluation benchmarks that truly require visual grounding to advance the development of more capable VLMs. Project page: http://vidground.etuagi.com.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。