arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2604.03478cs.LG
收藏

探讨数据干预以实现子群体公平性:ICU案例研究

Investigating Data Interventions for Subgroup Fairness: An ICU Case Study

University of California, Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校);Stanford University(斯坦福大学)

Erin Tan, Judy Hanwen Shen, Irene Y. Chen

AI总结:

本文通过ICU案例研究探讨数据干预对子群体公平性的影响,发现数据添加可能同时提升和损害模型公平性,结合数据与模型方法更有效。

摘要:

在高风险决策场景中,机器学习模型的算法偏见可能加剧对特定子群体的系统性伤害。这些偏见常源于训练数据。实践中,'修复数据'的干预依赖于可用的数据源,其中许多并不理想。在这些情况下,数据扩展对子群体性能的影响变得不稳定,因为样本量的增加改进被训练集分布偏移所抵消。本文探讨了在医疗健康领域结合数据源以改善子群体性能的局限性。在eICU协作研究数据库和MIMIC-IV数据集中,发现数据添加既有助于又损害模型公平性和性能,许多直观的数据选择策略不可靠。我们比较了基于模型的事后校准和数据导向的添加策略,发现结合两者对改善子群体性能至关重要。本文质疑了传统'更好数据'解决公平性挑战的观念,通过比较和结合数据和模型方法进行探讨。

英文摘要:

In high-stakes settings where machine learning models are used to automate decision-making about individuals, the presence of algorithmic bias can exacerbate systemic harm to certain subgroups of people. These biases often stem from the underlying training data. In practice, interventions to "fix the data" depend on the actual additional data sources available -- where many are less than ideal. In these cases, the effects of data scaling on subgroup performance become volatile, as the improvements from increased sample size are counteracted by the introduction of distribution shifts in the training set. In this paper, we investigate the limitations of combining data sources to improve subgroup performance within the context of healthcare. Clinical models are commonly trained on datasets comprised of patient electronic health record (EHR) data from different hospitals or admission departments. Across two such datasets, the eICU Collaborative Research Database and the MIMIC-IV dataset, we find that data addition can both help and hurt model fairness and performance, and many intuitive strategies for data selection are unreliable. We compare model-based post-hoc calibration and data-centric addition strategies to find that the combination of both is important to improve subgroup performance. Our work questions the traditional dogma of "better data" for overcoming fairness challenges by comparing and combining data- and model-based approaches.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑