arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2603.28992cs.LG
收藏

一种带有Wasserstein差距界约束的高斯混合流匹配显式替代方案

An Explicit Surrogate for Gaussian Mixture Flow Matching with Wasserstein Gap Bounds

Université Paris-Saclay, Inria, CIAMS(巴黎-萨克雷大学, 法国国家信息与自动化研究所, CIAMS);Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Quebec in Trois-Rivieres (UQTR)(魁北克大学三河城分校电气工程与计算机科学系)

Elham Rostami, Taous-Meriem Laleg-Kirati, Hamidou Tembine

AI总结:

本文提出一种显式速度场方法,用于无训练的高斯混合模型间流匹配,通过局部通勤 regime 的二次一致性和非局部 regime 的路径分割策略,提供显式替代方案和精确方法的比较。

摘要:

我们研究了使用显式速度场进行无训练的两个高斯混合模型(GMM)之间的流匹配,这些速度场将一个混合物随时间传输到另一个。我们的基线方法构建了分量级的高斯路径,使用满足连续性方程的仿射速度场,从而得到一个闭合形式的配对动能传输成本替代方案。与依赖矩阵平方根计算的精确高斯Wasserstein成本不同,该替代方案通过诱导流的动能得到简单的解析表达式。我们分析了该替代方案对精确成本的逼近程度。在局部通勤 regime 中证明了二次一致,并在局部通勤 regime 中推导出显式的三次误差界。为了处理非局部 regime,我们引入了路径分割策略,使协方差演变局部化,并允许分段应用该界。最后,我们比较了该替代方案与基于高斯Wasserstein测地线的精确构造,并总结了在实际 regime 地图中替代方案和精确方法的适用性。

英文摘要:

We study training-free flow matching between two Gaussian mixture models (GMMs) using explicit velocity fields that transport one mixture into the other over time. Our baseline approach constructs component-wise Gaussian paths with affine velocity fields satisfying the continuity equation, which yields to a closed-form surrogate for the pairwise kinetic transport cost. In contrast to the exact Gaussian Wasserstein cost, which relies on matrix square-root computations, the surrogate admits a simple analytic expression derived from the kinetic energy of the induced flow. We then analyze how closely this surrogate approximates the exact cost. We prove second-order agreement in a local commuting regime and derive an explicit cubic error bound in the local commuting regime. To handle nonlocal regimes, we introduce a path-splitting strategy that localizes the covariance evolution and enables piecewise application of the bound. We finally compare the surrogate with an exact construction based on the Gaussian Wasserstein geodesic and summarize the results in a practical regime map showing when the surrogate is accurate and the exact method is preferable.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑