arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2603.24972cs.CY
收藏

生成AI在高中教育中的群体差异化讨论:Reddit社区案例研究

Group-Differentiated Discourse on Generative AI in High School Education: A Case Study of Reddit Communities

Valley Christian High School(谷基督教高中);University of California, Riverside(加州大学河滨分校)

Parth Gaba, Emiliano De Cristofaro

AI总结:

研究分析不同Reddit社区对生成AI在高中教育中的讨论,发现教师更关注教学权衡,学生更关注指控与评分,检测相关讨论伴随更高负面情绪,提出过程性评估替代检测作为更公平的作者验证方法。

摘要:

本文研究不同Reddit社区对生成AI在高中教育中的讨论,聚焦学习、学术诚信、AI检测和情感框架。通过分析五个教育相关子版块的3789篇帖子,结合关键词检索、人工验证相关性过滤、LLM辅助标注和统计检验,发现利益相关者立场显著影响讨论:教师更倾向于明确阐述教学权衡,同时将AI描述为对学习有益又有害;学生则更多在指控、评分和执行方面进行战术讨论。所有群体中,检测相关讨论与显著更高的负面情绪相关,学生和混合社区影响更大。研究指出,AI检测不仅是争议性技术工具,也作为治理机制,对受机构执行影响的人施加不对称情感负担。最后提出,基于检测的执行不应作为主要学术诚信策略,过程性评估提供更公平的作者验证替代方案。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we study how different Reddit communities discuss generative AI in high school education, focusing on learning, academic integrity, AI detection, and emotional framing. Using 3,789 posts from five education-related subreddits, we compare student, teacher, and mixed communities using a pipeline that combines keyword retrieval, human-validated relevance filtering, LLM-assisted annotation, and statistical tests of group differences. We find that stakeholder position strongly shapes discourse: teachers are more likely to articulate explicit pedagogical trade-offs, simultaneously framing AI as both beneficial and harmful for learning, whereas students more often discuss AI tactically in relation to accusations, grades, and enforcement. Across all groups, detector-related discourse is associated with significantly higher negative emotion, with larger effects for students and mixed communities than for teachers. These results suggest that AI detectors function not only as contested technical tools but also as governance mechanisms that impose asymmetric emotional burdens on those subject to institutional enforcement. Finally, we argue that detection-based enforcement should not serve as a primary academic-integrity strategy and that process-based assessment offers a fairer alternative for verifying authorship in AI-mediated classrooms.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑