arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2603.20008hep-phastro-ph.COhep-th
收藏

QCD轴子能否在宇宙学常数问题中幸存?

Can QCD Axions Survive the Cosmological Constant Problem?

University of Sheffield(谢菲尔德大学);Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics(理论物理前沿研究所);McMaster University(麦克马斯特大学);Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies(都柏林高等研究院)

Carsten van de Bruck, C. P. Burgess, Adam Smith

AI总结:

本文探讨了真空能松弛机制对QCD轴子的影响,发现其真空势被抑制,导致轴子行为改变,可能违反观测约束。

摘要:

动态松弛真空能的机制为解决宇宙学常数问题提供了具体途径,但松弛不仅影响真空能,还会影响低能物理。本文通过'yoga'松弛模型探讨这一问题,显示松弛会相对抑制慢速物理过程,而影响轻标量场在宇宙学中的行为。重新审视QCD轴子时发现,真空势的抑制改变了其宇宙学时间尺度的行为,但不影响高速高能过程。结果表明,QCD轴子的质-耦合关系可能偏离标准范围,从而被观测约束排除。

英文摘要:

Mechanisms that dynamically relax the vacuum energy offer a concrete way to approach the cosmological constant problem, but because relaxation is not confined to the vacuum energy alone it can have consequences for the rest of low-energy physics. We explore this issue using the recently proposed 'yoga' relaxation models as an explicit framework and show how relaxation differentially suppresses 'slow' physics relative to a characteristic timescale set by the mass of the relaxon. It therefore need not alter e.g. Higgs & collider physics but can dramatically change how light scalar fields participate in cosmology. We revisit the QCD axion in this setting and show that the suppression of the axion's vacuum potential reshapes its behaviour on cosmological timescales while leaving fast, high-energy processes unaffected. The result is to alter the axion mass-coupling relation away from the standard QCD band, driving it into a regime already ruled out by observational constraints. In particular, suppression of the vacuum axion potential allows the QCD matter-induced potential to dominate even for matter densities relevant to cosmology and everyday matter, potentially driving the axion away from the CP-conserving minimum for QCD-motivated parameters. We conclude that conventional QCD axions are unlikely to remain viable in their standard form within vacuum-energy relaxation frameworks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑