arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2603.17872cs.CLcs.AI
收藏

通过领域导向的分层检索缓解大语言模型的幻觉

Mitigating LLM Hallucinations through Domain-Grounded Tiered Retrieval

Computational Unit, Z.H. College of Engineering & Technology, Aligarh Muslim University, India(计算单元,Z.H. 工程技术学院,阿利加尔穆斯林大学,印度);Interdisciplinary Center for Artificial Intelligence, Aligarh Muslim University, India(跨学科人工智能中心,阿利加尔穆斯林大学,印度);Department of Computer Engineering, Aligarh Muslim University, India(计算机工程系,阿利加尔穆斯林大学,印度)

Md. Asraful Haque, Aasar Mehdi, Maaz Mahboob, Tamkeen Fatima

AI总结:

本文提出一种领域导向的分层检索与验证架构,通过将LLM从随机模式匹配者转变为验证真理寻求者,系统拦截事实性不准确内容。在六个基准测试中,该框架在时间精度和数值准确性要求高的领域表现出色,但发现存在'假前提过度断言'的持续失败模式。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)虽然在流畅性上取得了空前成就,但仍然容易产生

英文摘要:

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unprecedented fluency but remain susceptible to "hallucinations" - the generation of factually incorrect or ungrounded content. This limitation is particularly critical in high-stakes domains where reliability is paramount. We propose a domain-grounded tiered retrieval and verification architecture designed to systematically intercept factual inaccuracies by shifting LLMs from stochastic pattern-matchers to verified truth-seekers. The proposed framework utilizes a four-phase, self-regulating pipeline implemented via LangGraph: (I) Intrinsic Verification with Early-Exit logic to optimize compute, (II) Adaptive Search Routing utilizing a Domain Detector to target subject-specific archives, (III) Refined Context Filtering (RCF) to eliminate non-essential or distracting information, and (IV) Extrinsic Regeneration followed by atomic claim-level verification. The system was evaluated across 650 queries from five diverse benchmarks: TimeQA v2, FreshQA v2, HaluEval General, MMLU Global Facts, and TruthfulQA. Empirical results demonstrate that the pipeline consistently outperforms zero-shot baselines across all environments. Win rates peaked at 83.7% in TimeQA v2 and 78.0% in MMLU Global Facts, confirming high efficacy in domains requiring granular temporal and numerical precision. Groundedness scores remained robustly stable between 78.8% and 86.4% across factual-answer rows. While the architecture provides a robust fail-safe for misinformation, a persistent failure mode of "False-Premise Overclaiming" was identified. These findings provide a detailed empirical characterization of multi-stage RAG behavior and suggest that future work should prioritize pre-retrieval "answerability" nodes to further bridge the reliability gap in conversational AI.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑