arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2603.16737cs.CVcs.AIcs.CL

检索反事实改进视觉上下文学习

Retrieving Counterfactuals Improves Visual In-Context Learning

University of Virginia(弗吉尼亚大学)

Guangzhi Xiong, Sanchit Sinha, Zhenghao He, Aidong Zhang

AI总结:

本文提出CIRCLES框架,通过主动检索反事实样例提升视觉语言模型的因果推理能力,实验表明其在多个数据集上优于现有方法,尤其在小规模模型和信息稀缺场景下表现突出。

摘要:

视觉语言模型(VLMs)在多种多模态推理任务中表现出色,但难以区分细粒度视觉属性并推理解释因果关系。上下文学习(ICL)为VLMs适应新任务提供了前景,但其效果依赖于演示示例的选择。现有检索增强方法通常依赖被动相似性检索,倾向于选择相关但非因果的示例,放大虚假关联并限制模型鲁棒性。我们引入CIRCLES(Composed Image Retrieval for Causal Learning Example Selection),一种新颖的框架,通过针对性、属性引导的合成图像检索主动构建演示集。通过整合反事实样例,CIRCLES使VLMs能够隐式推理解释属性与结果之间的因果关系,超越表面相关性,促进更稳健和扎根的推理。在四个多样化数据集上的全面实验表明,CIRCLES在多种架构上均优于现有方法,尤其在小规模模型和信息稀缺场景下表现显著。此外,CIRCLES检索更多多样且因果信息丰富的示例,提供定性洞察,揭示模型如何利用上下文演示提升推理能力。我们的代码可在https://github.com/gzxiong/CIRCLES获取。

英文摘要:

Vision-language models (VLMs) have achieved impressive performance across a wide range of multimodal reasoning tasks, but they often struggle to disentangle fine-grained visual attributes and reason about underlying causal relationships. In-context learning (ICL) offers a promising avenue for VLMs to adapt to new tasks, but its effectiveness critically depends on the selection of demonstration examples. Existing retrieval-augmented approaches typically rely on passive similarity-based retrieval, which tends to select correlated but non-causal examples, amplifying spurious associations and limiting model robustness. We introduce CIRCLES (Composed Image Retrieval for Causal Learning Example Selection), a novel framework that actively constructs demonstration sets by retrieving counterfactual-style examples through targeted, attribute-guided composed image retrieval. By incorporating counterfactual-style examples, CIRCLES enables VLMs to implicitly reason about the causal relations between attributes and outcomes, moving beyond superficial correlations and fostering more robust and grounded reasoning. Comprehensive experiments on four diverse datasets demonstrate that CIRCLES consistently outperforms existing methods across multiple architectures, especially on small-scale models, with pronounced gains under information scarcity. Furthermore, CIRCLES retrieves more diverse and causally informative examples, providing qualitative insights into how models leverage in-context demonstrations for improved reasoning. Our code is available at https://github.com/gzxiong/CIRCLES.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑