arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
​通知:联邦节假日调休:哥伦布日 / 原住民日(Columbus Day / Indigenous Peoples' Day),今日(13日)无更新。
arXiv 2603.15967cs.CV

一种针对肾数字病理图像的病理基础模型综合基准测试

A Comprehensive Benchmark of Histopathology Foundation Models for Kidney Digital Pathology Images

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Florida(佛罗里达大学电气与计算机工程系);Seed Production Innovation, Crop Science Division, Bayer Company(拜耳公司种子生产创新部);Division of Medicine – Quantitative Health, University of Florida(佛罗里达大学医学部-定量健康分部);Department of Health Outcomes and Biomedical Informatics, University of Florida(佛罗里达大学健康结果与生物医学信息学系);Department of Pathology, Immunology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine(佛罗里达大学医学院病理学、免疫学与实验室医学系);Kidney Disease Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health(美国国立卫生研究院糖尿病、消化系统与肾病研究所肾病分支);Indiana University School of Medicine(印第安纳大学医学院);Departments of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine(华盛顿大学医学院医学部);Universidade de Coimbra(科英布拉大学);Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California at Davis School of Medicine(加州大学戴维斯分校医学院病理学与实验室医学系);Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine(约翰霍普金斯大学医学院病理学系)
Harishwar Reddy Kasireddy, Patricio S. La Rosa, Akshita Gupta, Anindya S. Paul, Jamie L. Fermin, William L. Clapp, Meryl A. Waldman, Tarek M. El-Ashkar, Sanjay … 展开作者

Harishwar Reddy Kasireddy, Patricio S. La Rosa, Akshita Gupta, Anindya S. Paul, Jamie L. Fermin, William L. Clapp, Meryl A. Waldman, Tarek M. El-Ashkar, Sanjay Jain, Luis Rodrigues, Kuang Yu Jen, Avi Z. Rosenberg, Michael T. Eadon, Jeffrey B. Hodgin, Pinaki Sarder

AI总结:

本文评估了11种公开的病理基础模型在11个肾脏特定下游任务中的表现,揭示了其在肾病诊断中的适用性及改进方向。

摘要:

病理基础模型(HFMs)在大规模癌症数据集上预训练,已推动计算病理学发展。然而,其在非癌性慢性肾病中的适用性仍待探索。本文系统评估了11种公开的HFMs在11个肾脏特定下游任务中的表现,涵盖多种染色、空间尺度、任务类型和临床目标。Tile级性能通过重复分层组交叉验证评估,而滑片级任务通过重复嵌套分层交叉验证评估。统计显著性通过Friedman检验和配对Wilcoxon符号秩检验(Holm-Bonferroni校正)分析。为促进可重复性,我们发布了开源Python包kidney-hfm-eval,可复现评估流程。结果表明,HFMs在驱动粗粒度肾形态的任务中表现中等至良好,但在需要细粒度微结构辨别、复杂生物表型或滑片级预后推断的任务中表现下降。总体而言,当前HFMs似乎主要编码静态中粒度表示,可能难以捕捉细微肾病或预后信号。本研究强调了开发针对肾脏、多染色和多模态的基础模型的必要性,以支持临床可靠的肾病决策。

英文摘要:

Histopathology foundation models (HFMs), pretrained on large-scale cancer datasets, have advanced computational pathology. However, their applicability to non-cancerous chronic kidney disease remains underexplored, despite coexistence of renal pathology with malignancies such as renal cell and urothelial carcinoma. We systematically evaluate 11 publicly available HFMs across 11 kidney-specific downstream tasks spanning multiple stains (PAS, H&E, PASM, and IHC), spatial scales (tile and slide-level), task types (classification, regression, and copy detection), and clinical objectives, including detection, diagnosis, and prognosis. Tile-level performance is assessed using repeated stratified group cross-validation, while slide-level tasks are evaluated using repeated nested stratified cross-validation. Statistical significance is examined using Friedman test followed by pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank testing with Holm-Bonferroni correction and compact letter display visualization. To promote reproducibility, we release an open-source Python package, kidney-hfm-eval, available at https://pypi.org/project/kidney-hfm-eval/ , that reproduces the evaluation pipelines. Results show moderate to strong performance on tasks driven by coarse meso-scale renal morphology, including diagnostic classification and detection of prominent structural alterations. In contrast, performance consistently declines for tasks requiring fine-grained microstructural discrimination, complex biological phenotypes, or slide-level prognostic inference, largely independent of stain type. Overall, current HFMs appear to encode predominantly static meso-scale representations and may have limited capacity to capture subtle renal pathology or prognosis-related signals. Our results highlight the need for kidney-specific, multi-stain, and multimodal foundation models to support clinically reliable decision-making in nephrology.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑