arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2603.04746cs.AIcs.HCecon.GNq-fin.EC
收藏

展望人机协同AI:连续性、张力与未来研究

Visioning Human-Agentic AI Teaming: Continuity, Tension, and Future Research

University of Southern California(南加州大学);Arizona State University(亚利桑那州立大学);Peking University(北京大学)

Bowen Lou, Tian Lu, T. S. Raghu, Yingjie Zhang

AI总结:

本文提出Team SA理论作为人机协同AI转型的整合锚点,探讨在适应性自主下持续对齐的挑战与未来研究方向。

摘要:

人工智能正经历一场结构性变革,以能够进行开放性行动轨迹、生成性表示和输出以及演变目标的智能系统为标志。这些特性向人机协同(HAT)引入了结构性不确定性,包括对行为轨迹、认知基础和随时间推移的治理逻辑稳定性的不确定性。在这种情况下,通过在有限输出上达成一致无法确保对齐;必须在计划展开和优先事项变化的过程中持续维持。我们推进了团队情境意识(Team SA)理论,该理论基于共享感知、理解和预测,作为这一转变的整合锚点。虽然Team SA在分析上仍具有基础性,但其稳定逻辑假定一旦实现共享意识,将通过迭代更新支持协调行动。智能AI挑战了这一假设。我们的论点分两个阶段展开:首先,我们扩展Team SA,重新概念化人类和AI的意识,以开放性代理为背景,包括在异构系统中预测一致性的情境理解。其次,我们质疑在关系互动、认知学习和协调与控制中传统上被认为稳定团队协作的动态过程,在适应性自主下是否仍然有效。通过区分连续性和张力,我们澄清了哪些基础见解仍然有效,以及结构性不确定性引入了什么压力,并阐述了HAT的未来研究议程。HAT的核心挑战不在于人类和AI是否能在瞬间达成一致,而在于它们是否能持续保持对齐,随着未来不断被生成、修订、执行和治理。

英文摘要:

Artificial intelligence is undergoing a structural transformation marked by the rise of agentic systems capable of open-ended action trajectories, generative representations and outputs, and evolving objectives. These properties introduce structural uncertainty into human-AI teaming (HAT), including uncertainty about behavior trajectories, epistemic grounding, and the stability of governing logics over time. Under such conditions, alignment cannot be secured through agreement on bounded outputs; it must be continuously sustained as plans unfold and priorities shift. We advance Team Situation Awareness (Team SA) theory, grounded in shared perception, comprehension, and projection, as an integrative anchor for this transition. While Team SA remains analytically foundational, its stabilizing logic presumes that shared awareness, once achieved, will support coordinated action through iterative updating. Agentic AI challenges this presumption. Our argument unfolds in two stages: first, we extend Team SA to reconceptualize both human and AI awareness under open-ended agency, including the sensemaking of projection congruence across heterogeneous systems. Second, we interrogate whether the dynamic processes traditionally assumed to stabilize teaming in relational interaction, cognitive learning, and coordination and control continue to function under adaptive autonomy. By distinguishing continuity from tension, we clarify where foundational insights hold and where structural uncertainty introduces strain, and articulate a forward-looking research agenda for HAT. The central challenge of HAT is not whether humans and AI can agree in the moment, but whether they can remain aligned as futures are continuously generated, revised, enacted, and governed over time.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑