arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2603.04597cs.CLcs.AI
收藏

通过群体层面的自然语言反馈进行探索的强化学习

Bootstrapping Exploration with Group-Level Natural Language Feedback in Reinforcement Learning

Harbin Institute of Technology(哈尔滨工业大学)

Lei Huang, Xiang Cheng, Chenxiao Zhao, Guobin Shen, Junjie Yang, Xiaocheng Feng, Yuxuan Gu, Xing Yu, Bing Qin

AI总结:

GOLF通过整合群体层面的自然语言反馈,提升强化学习的探索效率和样本效率,实现2.2倍的改进。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLMs)通常通过与环境的交互接收多样的自然语言(NL)反馈。然而,当前的强化学习(RL)算法仅依赖标量奖励,导致自然语言反馈中的丰富信息未被充分利用,从而导致探索效率低下。在本工作中,我们提出了GOLF,一种强化学习框架,该框架明确利用群体层面的语言反馈来通过可操作的改进引导定向探索。GOLF聚合了两种互补的反馈来源:(i)外部批评,用于定位错误或提出针对性的修复方案,以及(ii)组内尝试,提供替代的局部想法和多样的失败模式。这些群体层面的反馈被聚合以产生高质量的改进,这些改进被适应性地注入到训练中作为off-policy支架,以在稀疏奖励区域提供定向指导。同时,GOLF在统一的RL循环中联合优化生成和改进,创造了一个良性循环,持续提升两者的能力。在可验证和不可验证的基准测试中,GOLF展示了优越的性能和探索效率,相对于仅使用标量奖励训练的RL方法,样本效率提高了2.2倍。代码可在https://github.com/LuckyyySTA/GOLF上获得。

英文摘要:

Large language models (LLMs) typically receive diverse natural language (NL) feedback through interaction with the environment. However, current reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms rely solely on scalar rewards, leaving the rich information in NL feedback underutilized and leading to inefficient exploration. In this work, we propose GOLF, an RL framework that explicitly exploits group-level language feedback to guide targeted exploration through actionable refinements. GOLF aggregates two complementary feedback sources: (i) external critiques that pinpoint errors or propose targeted fixes, and (ii) intra-group attempts that supply alternative partial ideas and diverse failure patterns. These group-level feedbacks are aggregated to produce high-quality refinements, which are adaptively injected into training as off-policy scaffolds to provide targeted guidance in sparse-reward regions. Meanwhile, GOLF jointly optimizes generation and refinement within a unified RL loop, creating a virtuous cycle that continuously improves both capabilities. Experiments on both verifiable and non-verifiable benchmarks show that GOLF achieves superior performance and exploration efficiency, achieving 2.2$\times$ improvements in sample efficiency compared to RL methods trained solely on scalar rewards. Code is available at https://github.com/LuckyyySTA/GOLF.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑