arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.23729cs.CLcs.AIcs.LG
收藏

从静态基准到动态协议:面向评估LLM推理能力的代理中心文本异常检测

From Static Benchmarks to Dynamic Protocol: Agent-Centric Text Anomaly Detection for Evaluating LLM Reasoning

LG AI Research(LG人工智能研究)

Seungdong Yoa, Sanghyu Yoon, Suhee Yoon, Dongmin Kim, Ye Seul Sim, Junhyun Lee, Woohyung Lim

AI总结:

本文提出了一种动态协议,通过代理中心文本异常检测评估LLM推理能力,以克服静态数据集的局限性。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLM)的评估主要依赖于静态数据集,这些数据集在可扩展性方面有限,并且无法捕捉到最近模型不断发展的推理能力。为了克服这些限制,我们提出了一种以代理为中心的基准测试范式,通过引入动态协议超越静态数据集,在此协议中,自主代理会迭代地生成、验证和解决问题。在此协议中,教师代理生成候选问题,协调代理严格验证其有效性并防止对抗性攻击,学生代理尝试解决经过验证的问题。无效的问题由教师代理修订直到通过验证。如果学生正确解决了问题,协调代理会提示教师生成更具挑战性的变体。因此,基准测试的难度会随着更高级的代理被替换到任何角色而自动增加,从而能够逐步评估大型语言模型,而无需手动整理的数据集。采用文本异常检测作为我们的主要评估格式,这要求跨句子的逻辑推理并抵抗模式匹配的捷径,我们证明了该协议系统地暴露了传统基准测试无法揭示的边缘案例推理错误。我们进一步倡导沿着几个互补的轴线评估系统,包括跨模型成对表现和初始问题与协调最终问题之间的进步。通过将焦点从固定数据集转向动态协议,我们的方法为评估不断演变的语言模型提供了一个可持续的方向,并引入了一个以代理中心基准的共进化为中心的研究议程。

英文摘要:

The evaluation of large language models (LLMs) has predominantly relied on static datasets, which offer limited scalability and fail to capture the evolving reasoning capabilities of recent models. To overcome these limitations, we propose an agent-centric benchmarking paradigm that moves beyond static datasets by introducing a dynamic protocol in which autonomous agents iteratively generate, validate, and solve problems. Within this protocol, a teacher agent generates candidate problems, an orchestrator agent rigorously verifies their validity and guards against adversarial attacks, and a student agent attempts to solve the validated problems. An invalid problem is revised by the teacher agent until it passes validation. If the student correctly solves the problem, the orchestrator prompts the teacher to generate more challenging variants. Consequently, the benchmark scales in difficulty automatically as more capable agents are substituted into any role, enabling progressive evaluation of large language models without manually curated datasets. Adopting text anomaly detection as our primary evaluation format, which demands cross-sentence logical inference and resists pattern-matching shortcuts, we demonstrate that this protocol systematically exposes corner-case reasoning errors that conventional benchmarks fail to reveal. We further advocate evaluating systems along several complementary axes including cross-model pairwise performance and progress between the initial and orchestrator-finalized problems. By shifting the focus from fixed datasets to dynamic protocols, our approach offers a sustainable direction for evaluating ever-evolving language models and introduces a research agenda centered on the co-evolution of agent-centric benchmarks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑