对两篇JASA文章《频繁主义模型平均》和《聚焦信息准则》讨论者的回应，由Nils Lid Hjort和Gerda Claeskens撰写
Rejoinder to the discussants of the two JASA articles `Frequentist Model Averaging' and `The Focused Information Criterion', by Nils Lid Hjort and Gerda Claeskens
AI总结：
Hjort和Claeskens回应了两篇JASA文章的讨论，针对频繁主义模型平均和聚焦信息准则的核心问题和贡献进行总结。
摘要：
我们非常荣幸有几位专家如此深入地阅读和讨论我们的工作。感谢所有的赞赏和鼓励，同时欢迎众多补充评论、 thoughtful提醒、新视角和额外主题，并深表感激。我们也要感谢JASA编辑Francisco Samaniego及其编辑助手组织了这次讨论。空间不允许我们回答讨论者提出的许多有价值的点，但以下我们尝试回应我们认为主要的问题。我们的回应按主题而不是讨论者来组织。我们将两篇文章称为『FMA论文』（Hjort和Claeskens）和『FIC论文』（Claeskens和Hjort）。
英文摘要：
We are honoured to have our work read and discussed at such a thorough level by several experts. Words of appreciation and encouragement are gratefully received, while the many supplementary comments, thoughtful reminders, new perspectives and additional themes raised are warmly welcomed and deeply appreciated. Our thanks go also to JASA Editor Francisco Samaniego and his editorial helpers for organising this discussion. Space does not allow us answering all of the many worthwhile points raised by our discussants, but in the following we make an attempt to respond to what we perceive of as being the major issues. Our responses are organised by themes rather than by discussants. We shall refer to our two articles as `the FMA paper' (Hjort and Claeskens) and `the FIC paper' (Claeskens and Hjort).
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
