arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2602.19282cond-mat.supr-con
收藏

在压强下Ruddlesden-Popper镍酸盐中超导体积分数近两倍的高估

Nearly twofold overestimation of the superconducting volume fraction in pressurized Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates

M.N. Miheev Institute of Metal Physics, Ural Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences(俄罗斯科学院乌拉尔分校 M.N. 米赫耶夫金属物理研究所)

Aleksandr V. Korolev, Evgeny F. Talantsev

AI总结:

本文指出Zhu等人提出的计算超导体积分数f的方程和程序存在错误,导致超导体积分数被高估,影响了Ruddlesden-Popper镍酸盐的相关研究。

摘要:

在压强下Ruddlesden-Popper镍酸盐中直流抗磁状态的检测一直是一个未解决的实验问题,直到最近Zhu等人在零场冷却(ZFC)模式下测量了压强La4Ni3O10的直流抗磁响应。Zhu等人报告说,测量的ZFC磁矩与样品的迈斯纳磁矩的比值(该比值被称为超导体积分数f)达到81-86%。我们认为这些出色实验结果是正确的;然而,基于报告的实验数据集使用标准程序进行计算,得出的比值为51-59%。在我们的要求下,Zhu等人提供了详细的解释和他们用来计算f的方程。据我们所知,该程序和方程用于计算f从未被提及或描述过,包括在参考文献中。在这里我们争论所提出的方程和程序是不正确的,且该方程导致了样品中超导体积分数的多倍高估。这种高估误差影响了迄今为止报告的所有Ruddlesden-Popper镍酸盐的超导体积分数f。因此,我们在此论文中描述了我们发现的错误。

英文摘要:

The detection of the DC diamagnetic state in pressurized Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates remained an unsolved experimental problem until recent experiments in which Zhu et al.$^1$ measured the DC diamagnetic responses in zero-field cooled (ZFC) mode in pressurized La4Ni3O10. Zhu et al.$^1$ reported that the ratio of the measured ZFC magnetic moment to the Meissner magnetic moment of the sample (and this ratio was termed the superconducting volume fraction$f$) reaches 81-86%. We regard outstanding experimental results$^1$; however, our calculations based on the reported experimental datasets$^1$ using the standard procedure showed the ratio to be 51-59%. Upon our request, Zhu et al.$^1$ provided detailed explanations and the equation they used to calculate$f$. To our knowledge, the procedure$^1$ and equation$^1$ for calculating $f$ have never been mentioned or described before, including in Ref.$^1$. Here we argue that the proposed equation$^1$ and procedure$^1$ are incorrect, and that this equation$^1$ results in multiple overestimations of the superconducting volume fraction in the sample. This overestimation error affects all superconducting volume fractions $f$ in Ruddlesden-Popper nickelates reported to date$^{1-4}$. Therefore, we describe the error we discovered in this paper.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑